Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

FYI East Dulwich neighbours: I was in the middle of a cash withdrawl at the cashpoint at the Tesco Express on ED road (the one next to the Esso petrol station) when a man appeared beside me waving his hands over the screen and saying not to use it because it had just taken his card. He then dissapeared and I cancelled the withdrawl. No card was returned. It took me literally 30 seconds (max) to realise something wasn't right and 'freeze' the card on my mobile/banking app. I immediately got a txt message from my bank saying a transaction had just been declined, and then another. I logged in to app and £251.50 had already been taken. This all happened increadibly quickly - the whole incident from first encounter to money being taken and me freezing card was probably around 3 minutes. The guy must have somehow seen me put my PIN number in. It's possible there was some kind of card skmming involved, but I don't know for sure. The man was around 5ft 6/7, black and wearing a covid-type face mask. I don't remember what clothes he was wearing. I got the feeling (mainly from his voice and eyes) that he wasn't young - maybe mid-30s to mid-40s (but I can't be sure). Obviously I repoted to police. 

Edited by thejournalist
Edited: correction to exact amount of money taken, £251.50
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 4

It might be helpful to know what kind of MO was involved.  Is it possible that the hand-waving man  (a) retrieved your card?  (b) accessed the keypad at all?  Have you found out how or where or for what item(s) the £251 transaction took place, or where your card ended up?

How, btw, does one cancel an ongoing ATM withdrawal?   I've got no idea in my mind of  what keypad options are available. 

1 hour ago, ianr said:

It might be helpful to know what kind of MO was involved.  Is it possible that the hand-waving man  (a) retrieved your card?  (b) accessed the keypad at all?  Have you found out how or where or for what item(s) the £251 transaction took place, or where your card ended up?

How, btw, does one cancel an ongoing ATM withdrawal?   I've got no idea in my mind of  what keypad options are available. 

there's a cancel button on the keypad or screen prompt.

So, i've had time to think about ever step of this incident. The main points are:

  • I'd entered my pin number and was on the screen/page where you put in how much you want to withdraw
  • At exactly that point the guy appeared and said the machine had taken his card, and started waving his hands over screen
  • A 'menu' option came up on screen with two choices, one bottom left, one bottom right
  • The bottom left option said something about entering a code to continue with transaction
  • The guy was saying "press that or it'll take your card" - I didn't press either but he might have
  • I haven't ever seen these on-screen options before - I didn't enter any details
  • The guy then disappeared
  • I pressed the 'cancel' button on keypad - the physical keypad - same screen options remained - no card was returned

Within 30 seconds of me realising card wasn't coming out I froze card on banking app and immediately had two txt msgs from bank saying transactions were being declined (but one for £251 had already gone though). The ref on bank statement for all three was: CARDTRONICS UK LTD BT KIOSK O/S 54 EA. Bank statement also said the date, time and that there was a £1.50 ATM withdrawl fee. 

I checked to see if there's a cashpoint in newsagent next door, but there's not. The cashpoint at petrol station is free so no ATM fee there eiher. 

 

7 minutes ago, thejournalist said:

So, i've had time to think about ever step of this incident. The main points are:

  • I'd entered my pin number and was on the screen/page where you put in how much you want to withdraw
  • At exactly that point the guy appeared and said the machine had taken his card, and started waving his hands over screen
  • A 'menu' option came up on screen with two choices, one bottom left, one bottom right
  • The bottom left option said something about entering a code to continue with transaction
  • The guy was saying "press that or it'll take your card" - I didn't press either but he might have
  • I haven't ever seen these on-screen options before - I didn't enter any details
  • The guy then disappeared
  • I pressed the 'cancel' button on keypad - the physical keypad - same screen options remained - no card was returned

Within 30 seconds of me realising card wasn't coming out I froze card on banking app and immediately had two txt msgs from bank saying transactions were being declined (but one for £251 had already gone though). The ref on bank statement for all three was: CARDTRONICS UK LTD BT KIOSK O/S 54 EA. Bank statement also said the date, time and that there was a £1.50 ATM withdrawl fee. 

I checked to see if there's a cashpoint in newsagent next door, but there's not. The cashpoint at petrol station is free so no ATM fee there eiher. 

 

The co-op uses ATMs operated by Cardtronics, and they also operate a digital ATM service (meaning he could have made those transactions electronically). 

That cashpoint is operated by Natwest. It sounds like he brought up their 'Get Cash' scheme screen as the distraction (a way that allows Natwest customers to withdraw cash without needing to use their card). So he was using a skimming device to steal your card in that moment, but brought up the Get Cash screen to distract you while he did that. Your confusion was just long enough for him to get away. Card thieves are incredibly slick.

Here is some info on Natwest Get Cash for reference -

'To use a Get Cash code at a NatWest ATM, you first initiate the withdrawal through the NatWest mobile app, which generates a secure code. You then visit a compatible ATM (NatWest, Royal Bank of Scotland, or Tesco ATMs). At the ATM, press the "Enter" key and follow the on-screen prompts, entering the code twice. The code is valid for 3 hours, and if expired, funds will be recredited to your account.'

I use that cashpoint all the time, so it's good to know if a local thief is targetting Natwest ATMs.

 

  • Thanks 1

Being scammed is horrible.  So first of all, sympathies to you there

but fair play for the details and the extra thought on subsequent posts and additional comments from others  - genuinely helpful 

 

seeing a generic “I got done - be careful” is the kind of thing we all nod along with but think wouldn’t happen to us.  But I feel these extra details would inform any potential future experience I might have and might save me money and hassle 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

Thanks to everyone who replied in this thread. Genuinely helpful information, observations and thoughts... and helps restore my broader faith in humanity! Also, my bank just told me someone called them saying they had found my card on Crystal Palace Road. Thank you people of East Dulwich ❤️.

Edited by thejournalist
  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
20 hours ago, Insuflo said:

“54 Ea” must be 54, East Dulwich Road? Which is the other side of the road. Isn’t there a combined pay phone/ cash machine kiosk outside the Londis?

Yes, you're right. And within a 20 second sprint. 

IMG_20250524_153642.jpg

Amazing how fast he was. He literally had something like a minute between stealing the card and using another cashpoint before it was blocked. The bank will return the money but willing to bet he will hit that same ATM with the same ruse again at some point.

  • Agree 1

Might be worth pointing out it might be a good idea to be suspicious of anyone who comes near you that is wearing a mask.

Covid is a thing of the past

In the same area I have seen several young lads wearing masks on bikes, they slow down when going past anyone 'fiddling' with mobile phones. they move on if its an old model that is not worth stealing. There have been several incidents of movile phone thefts around Goose Green.

YES  some people  are immune deficient  and perhaps still feel they need to wear a mask although I question how nessesary that is in the open air.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 3

The other thing I do at an ATM, is cover the card slot with my right hand while the card is in there. I then use my left hand for the rest. If a card does not come out, then you can look for a skimming device and remove it, ATMs are badly designed imo. They could be recessed to make side sccess impossible for a would be theif. The pin number aspect is a weakness also.

5 hours ago, Blah Blah said:

The other thing I do at an ATM, is cover the card slot with my right hand while the card is in there. I then use my left hand for the rest. If a card does not come out, then you can look for a skimming device and remove it, ATMs are badly designed imo. They could be recessed to make side sccess impossible for a would be theif. The pin number aspect is a weakness also.

Good advice. Also, thinking about it, seems crazy that cashpoint technology is basically the same as it was decades ago. 

  • Like 1

Before using an ATM, I always look around and see if there any likely opportunists hanging around. If there is, I just walk away and observe from close by.  At the ATM, I always  cup my left hand over the key pad when entering the pin with my right. I then have one hand ready to collect the cash and the other over the card slot.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...