Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Was Peckham rye ever SE22 l only ask because the Peckham rye street signs one is SE15 and the other one is SE22.I was once told that the Gardens was SE15 before some plum in the mouth snobs had it turned into SE22.

davidallotey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was once told that the Gardens was

> SE15 before some plum in the mouth snobs had it

> turned into SE22.


East Dulwich was no posher than peckham until quite recently, so whoever told you that is obviously talking out of their arse!

Yes, I could but I won't. Yet!


Signs all over the place reminding we are in England, telling us DO NOT CLIMB THIS SCULPTURE and DO NOT PHOTOGRAPH THIS PRECIOUS WORK OF ART


are


NOT to be seen at this amazing beautiful work of art!


Yay!


Well done artists and thanks to the Councillors who awarded the tiny amount of CGS award that allowed it to be done!

davidallotey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was once told that the Gardens was

> SE15 before some plum in the mouth snobs had it

> turned into SE22.


When did this happen?


I've been here for decades and AFAIK the area west of Peckham Rye and south of East Dulwich Road has been SE22 for a very long time.

morganico.com Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @PeknamRose the title of a person who tinkers with

> trees is called an arborist or tree surgeon i

> believe (or sculptor/artist in my case)... indeed

> we are carving a sculpture from the dead Plane

> tree (or finding the sculpture within it az they

> say in artspeak) with a community theme suggestid

> by a Peknam person. John Martin a local resident

> applied for funding for it via the Cleaner,

> Greener, Safer scheme run by Nils Battye at

> Southwark council which also funded the nearby

> bollarts and mural project outside the Herne

> Tavern. the funding schemes are awarded on a

> yearly basis with community improve idea suggestid

> by people who live and werk in the borough..yous

> can suggest ideas for it anytime... cheers.

> morganico(.com)"


This from page one of the thread.

The money awarded from the CGS was ?2500.


http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/ieDecisionDetails.aspx?Id=4410


A pot of around ?250k is available from the CGS each year. Any individual or community group within Southwark can apply for funding for any project that falls within the remit of the scheme.


There's a lot of imformation about the scheme on Southwark's website.

  • 3 weeks later...
Am I the only one who is depressed by the production of this sculpture, the absence of design research as relates to the area, the crude addition of wings once the sculptor discovered that Blake had seen angels on Peckham Rye (though this is such an old chestnut - lots of other interesting things happened on the Rye over the years including a race by Boudica!), lack of consutation with local community, lack of documentation on site......

The overall production looks Good. Though I have only seen it from my car.


I have no understanding of any relevance to the local area if there is any.


I do not much appreciate the addition of the 'Wings' and others have expressed similar views

Do not think they add anything to the piece.


But them I'm only a Fox.


DulwichFox.

for the emigr?s and in case people haven't seen it


The blurb said "The piece, sculpted from a damaged tree, is based on the notion of unity and friendship ? feelings Morganico felt were rooted in the local area."


Clearly morganico hasn't been on the edf ;-P


 

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> for the emigr?s and in case people haven't seen it

>

>

> The blurb said "The piece, sculpted from a damaged

> tree, is based on the notion of unity and

> friendship ? feelings Morganico felt were rooted

> in the local area."

>

> Clearly morganico hasn't been on the edf ;-P

>


The EDF is often the acerbic 'pithy' side of the 'local area'. Perhaps he has visited Nunhead and the piece is based on that....

hpsaucey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> El Pibe Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > for the emigr?s and in case people haven't seen

> it

> >

> >

> > The blurb said "The piece, sculpted from a

> damaged

> > tree, is based on the notion of unity and

> > friendship ? feelings Morganico felt were

> rooted

> > in the local area."

> >

> > Clearly morganico hasn't been on the edf ;-P

> >

>

> The EDF is often the acerbic 'pithy' side of the

> 'local area'. Perhaps he has visited Nunhead and

> the piece is based on that....


Darn - I'm a Nunheadian but I've blown it by revealing my pithy side...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...