Jump to content

Recommended Posts

 

1 hour ago, malumbu said:

Smokeless still allowed.  Wood should also be appropriately seasoned.  I expect far more issues with people burning dodgy wood.  

I have an open fireplace in my living room.

I burn those smokeless log type things, but it's not my main source of heat (gas central heating).

They are ok but very heavy, and bulky to store.

But it's nice sitting opposite a real fire occasionally on a dark Winter night and watching the flames.

"Parents driving children to private schools is associated with a 27% increase in air pollution and congestion in a south London street, according to campaigners who are calling for private schools to make greater use of sustainable transport":

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/jan/14/private-school-run-in-south-london-linked-to-27-per-cent-rise-in-air-pollution#:~:text=Private school run in south London linked to 27% rise in air pollution.&text=The analysis by Solve the School Run,when only local state schools were open.

More detail on the campaign group who did the research (I haven't looked at it that closely, so can't comment on how robust it may be): https://www.solvetheschoolrun.org/dulwich-wards#:~:text=We found that there is a 50%,term time compared with the school holidays.&text=Our research for Herne Hill Junction%2C Dulwich%2C,school term time compared to school holidays.

Edited by Earl Aelfheah

Seems to be a very divisive article title with the area cherrypicked to to provide the class warfare angle.

I'm pretty sure if similar pollution measurements were taken at the Friern Road / Etherow Street junction (near St Anthony's) or Whatley Road / Landcroft Road junction (near Harris East Dulwich) the results would be about the same.

The interesting thing about that article is Imperial College commenting on it because the source of the data supposedly comes from Breathe London which is a monitoring group set-up by.....wait for it......Imperial College....

 

And when you go onto the Breathe London site there is a map showing their monitoring locations and I can't find one anywhere near the area the increase is supposed to have been seen. Does anyone know how they came to this number?

6 hours ago, rjsmall said:

Seems to be a very divisive article title with the area cherrypicked to to provide the class warfare angle.

I'm pretty sure if similar pollution measurements were taken at the Friern Road / Etherow Street junction (near St Anthony's) or Whatley Road / Landcroft Road junction (near Harris East Dulwich) the results would be about the same.

Don't know about the title of the article, but yes, I suspect it's the same around a number of schools / the area generally. Like I said, it makes sense that increases in term time traffic worsen local air quality.

The private schools are the main issue, so JAGs and Alleyns due to wide catchment. Kids coming to and from Harris EDG seems to be on foot, bike, scooter, bus and train. However I have witnessed a car parking (in a resident zone) and two kids pile out to go to JAGs … and cycle about 10 metres. I imagine when they fill in the ‘how did you here today’ questionnaire they put down - by bike. Just as an observation, ED Grove feels and smells like the old days during Private School holidays and a nightmare for pollution at school run during the term. It’s not ‘local’ traffic.

  • Agree 2

@heartblock - completely agree.   Utterly ridiculous that children are being driven to school.  It's bad for people living on the roads, bad for the children and bad for everyone.  The schools should do more.

That said - the 'old days' were back-to-back tailbacks from JAGs and Alleyn's to the Melbourne Grove church.   Thank goodness those days are gone.

  • Agree 2

I have lived in the same place for 35ish years.
 

The tailbacks were created when the crossing traffic lights on the near Alleyn’s 4 -way was redesigned by the ‘planner’ who messed up IMO about 20 years ago.

Then it was bad…but then became worse after more recent events. I would love EDG to be buses, bikes, registered taxis, emergency vehicles and residents only up to the health-centre and small shopping parade - from the Lordship Lane end,  with some drop off and trade parking places - it is a school road after all.

Encourage active travel and reduce pollution, which is at its height when kids are walking to school… also,  if the person who keeps burning stinky wood on their wood burning stove in Melbourne Grove could stop this Winter I would be most grateful, it exacerbates my asthma. 

  • Like 1

All you are doing if that was to happen is diverting car drivers into or onto side roads.

I am a car driver but hardly use b my car st all when zi am in ED - buses and train is so convenient and reliable. Having said that, not pleasant in heat with sweaty people, bo etc but that is life.

Without doubt my breathing is worse when I am in London -Dockland and canary wharf  is bearable and fresher. Not even with  inhaler does it get sny better

 

Many people live on ‘main roads’, it is cheaper accommodation, than side roads, so less wealthy people live on them. Also usually more densely populated. Granted in ED “cheap” is 400k - 600k, however my neighbours are cheaper in rentals and some ‘council’ housing stock.
 

I’m sure the young lungs of my neighbours are just as affected by pollution as young lungs on side roads.

Anyway… it’s important that traffic is reduced, I can’t think of any reason apart from physical or psychological impairment for anyone to drive locally. ED is a great place to walk or cycle in. It’s the non-local traffic from private school children parents&guardians and ‘staff’ that mess up my road.

  • Agree 1

@heartblock - I think it's everyone that drives along EDG that is messing up your road, but yes, there will be noticeably less traffic next week with the private schools on holiday.

Do you know what happened to the proposal to put a cycle lane along EDG?

I think where the buses pass it’s too narrow and removing street parking (that residents pay for) in an area with no private parking for 70% of the road, would not be something that the council would approve one thinks, however they could have been creative using the back of the Dutch Estate and maybe widening the pavement for parts of the road to make a cycle path on one side. People cycle on the pavement anyway, so having a designated cycle ‘lane’ would make it safer.
 

The pavement and the road surface have not been improved for over 15 years, unlike many of the side streets off EDG that have had huge amounts of money thrown at them. It would be nice to see the council to show it a bit of love….as a major route for school kids, patients and residents - I don’t think there is any political will though.

  • 2 months later...

The 200 years is rather exaggerated but great that the ULEZ together with sustainable streets, better emissions standards and move to EVs has delivered.  Ironic that more effective emissions standards was due in part to VW cheating.  It's world, not EU or UK standards.

  • Agree 1

The answer will doubtless be documented somewhere, but does anyone know offhand why the three named exceptional 'non-AURN' London measuring sites (including Loampit Vale and Brixton Road) could be  excluded from the figures?

Edited by ianr
21 hours ago, malumbu said:

The 200 years is rather exaggerated but great that the ULEZ together with sustainable streets, better emissions standards and move to EVs has delivered. 

Yes, agree about the headline, but the fact that air pollution has dropped so dramatically is fantastic. It will save many lives.

The news that this has dropped is good news indeed but very interested to understand why they have excluded the only 3 sites that failed to reach the threshold. they seem to mention the siting of the monitors.

Also the headline in the press release is ludicrous - 200 years earlier than predicted just dilutes the impact of the story and I am sure makes people question whether the Mayor is just doing a bit of showboating. Of course, will the same high bar be reached for other pollutants (PM2.5 etc) that were also said to be addressed by Ulez etc?

The Defra report does cover those other pollutants but the Mayor's press release makes no reference to them.

https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/the-truth-about-londons-ultra-low-emission-zone/

Interesting report by LSE on the ULEZ debunking some of the myths and fake news.

Focus is on NO2 as this is primarily due to transport emissions.  Particulates come from numerous sources including domestic burning of coal and wood.  Even before the ULEZ most road vehicles came with particulate filters (diesel) and three way cats (petrol) that dealt with larger particles of soot.  Age constraints on taxis and retrofitting older buses, was an important step 

Greater focus on finer particulates now.

  • Like 1

Academic paper referred to here published in 2019, I haven't seen the paper so can't comment on why it would have taken 200 years to reach legal street level ambient levels of NO2  https://www.forbes.com/sites/carltonreid/2019/03/11/193-years-for-london-to-be-rid-of-the-invisible-killer-that-paris-will-banish-within-two-decades/

Simplistically the calculation should be:

No interventions to improve air quality beyond turn over of vehicles and improved technology as emissions standards improve

vs additional measures this Mayor brought it (and last one proposed).

The 200 years could only refer to a small section of the London road network.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • With fibre you are paying for the speed, which is the number, yours is 300 so if you did a lot of gaming, for example, you would want the fastest possible.  If it's just office work or maybe streaming on Netflix you likely won't need as fast, but, if there are a lot of people in your house all doing their own thing on different devices, then faster speeds are better.  I don't rely on my Wi-Fi much other than when I am using my mobile.  I use Ethernet cables to connect up everything, I Have one cable running from my router, along the skirtings and through a hole I drilled in the wall to another room.  I have attached the plusnet speed guide which gives you an idea of how it works.   
    • I'd reread what you posted and try to summarise.  It just comes across as a rant.
    • Just shows, to me, once proud to be a citizen of UK.. now.. well if we pay/contribute to services - nhs, police, fire etc and folk who have made this there home - no matter what creed or culture.. for the love c of God, can someone  please explain to me.. how we have working royals who like them or not, have tried and continue to actually support and make a change and then we have Andrew.. who just destroys everything.. not just him, or royalty but his own children..  I had great admiration for The Queen - and respect.. as have a huge number of people.. but.. these old traditions where gosh.. live rent free and can’t get chucked out until I believe 2070? From what I scanned..well he has and continues to have it all.. has to go thru what old rules? Etc.  doubt very much he has even kept the upkeep maintenance up on his abode.. and do the shite keeps on pulling up.. What has Andrew done for UK or for that matter since he was 20?? Do please tell me       Totally off topic, before anyone jumps down my throat.. I just do not get how anyone is proud to be British at this point in time. Whoever is in power, seems to be able to help themselves to the public purse with no redress at all - Covid is a great example of lining of pockets.. Millions  given to Rowanda, so one is led to believe, to help with refugee problem and one can’t get a plane load off!  I simply do not get it at all. Use of food banks in UK growing yearly, homeless as well, nhs, police, fire service etc all on their knees..        
    • Have applied the green roof at a number of properties and no issues you are concerned about detected. Have issues with cats defecating in the vicinity, however, they are not selecting the green roof specifically. Use decent compost, slow release fertiliser specific for green roofs, and lay it methodically not leaving blank patches. It looks amazing when cared for and adds value.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...