Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Whilst I think it's great the cycle path has been upgraded I have found one thing pretty dangerous on my second or third ride along it recently. 

The junction with Sainsbury's and Bessemer passage has raised tiles to raise awareness for pedestrians that they are joining a cycle lane.  

 

The blurb from a maker's site says:

The orientation of the bars indicates whether the entry is for the cycleway or the footpath. On the footpath, the bars should be perpendicular (ladder surface) to the direction of travel, whilst on the cycleway they should be parallel (tramline) to the direction of travel.

Well this is all very well,but if you have ridden over them in the wet and had to deviate you may well have nearly lost your front wheel, as I did. Even when riding straight ahead the channeling effect is really unsettling and I'm amazed this is the best design. 

As someone recovering from collarbone surgery- this is something I can do without! Two-wheelers are very likely to come off here, esp when you consider the traffic to and from the school, etc. 

 

Any other thoughts?

 

Thanks.

20250624_152221.jpg

I came across the comment below so seems this part of the track is supposed to be a pedestrian area but agree if you cycle across the parallel bars especially when filled with rainwater there's a high chance of coming off in the tramlines.  Once you know it's there you can take appropriate action but first time users could be caught out. ☹️

 

Note that this is at the entry of the cycle lane. It's not designed to alert cyclists that their lane is ending; it's designed to make sure that cyclists do not enter the pedestrian lane (and that pedestrians do not enter the cycle lane).

Not sure how good they are.  This junction in vauxhall bridge road is absolutely lethal for pedestrians as cyclists just ride across the pedestrian area at high speed.  I've seen a few near catastrophes at this site.

Screenshot_20250625-094308.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Nope. I don’t have this wrong. I’ve tried to put my point across respectfully, and explain that I understand the nuance of editing, story-telling and reporting better than many, without resorting to personal, angry insults. And all my colleagues agree that the BBC got this right in its condemnation.    All you see is confirmation bias.    If you don’t realise that, then you’re part of the problem.    
    • We have always gone during the week at lunch time - great place and good value. Husband has been several times on his own and owner knows his first name. I could not go one time for some reason and she sent him home with some spring rolls (free)
    • We did but they would not budge.   Anyway this was last year - things may have changed and staff may be different. It was a man who served us.
    • Because some people have weird fake beliefs and when people point out just how fake by pointing at actual events the fake people get all huffy and say “this is why “ make your argument instead of repeating  nonsense - why am I wrong? Because what you have said doesn’t make that argument  or admit you might have this wrong  Which words on my last post are false or make you not post? What is the problem ? Someone posts: “You don't know what you're talking about, Sephiroth,” and I reply with that happened.  And this same person the responds with “this is why people don’t post on the forum anymore !” like - they were rude  to and dismissive of me, right?  But I’m the bad guy? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...