Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Penguin68 said:

They are not defending driving across the pavement, they are noting that certain types of pavement obstruction are positioned to disallow any overhang across pavement areas for certain types of vehicle when their wheels are only on the road. Which is a function of narrow roads and modern vehicles. Which can be exacerbated by the imposition of build outs and central bollard islands as additions to existing narrow roads. 

Savings lives, see alex_b's informed and personal post above trump's a little bit of inconvenience.  

  • Agree 2
7 minutes ago, first mate said:

Penguin, do be reasonable, anything that makes driving a car really difficult - or even hazardous, has the thumbs up, from some. After all, people need to make 'smarter' choices. 

It’s only “hazardous” if you chose to drive in such a way that your vehicle crosses the pavement and risks hitting a pedestrian. If the junction is too tight for a vehicle to be able to safely do so the driver should take an alternative route - no different to avoiding a low or narrow bridge.

Also the council had already removed parking opposite the junction to give vehicles more space to manoeuvre, it used to be much worse with coaches regularly getting stuck. . 

  • Agree 2
20 hours ago, alex_b said:

It’s only “hazardous” if you chose to drive in such a way that your vehicle crosses the pavement and risks hitting a pedestrian

Yeah but what happens if I need to drive across a pavement because I'm in a rush or just a bit too busy texting? Why should I be punished by a static object like a bollard?

I think the bollards should be removed. Also, people should stop moaning if I occasionally brush up against their cars when I'm driving. So what if you lost a wing mirror or a bumper? People keep jumping to the conclusion that I'm a shitty inattentive driver, but it's not my fault, it's all the bloody EU safety features these days.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Initially, when all the discussion took place at Bradbury some of existing building was to be demolished which meant that 3 flats would go but these residents would have to wait until new building erected to be housed. No indication has been given as to where people would be placed during building. I am glad that the tree is to remain - Bradbury residents contacted various environmental groups to lobby for tree to remain. I gather that there is likely to be a question of restricted views to be made by Wood Vale residents as 5 stories is significantly higher than current building. 
    • South London Youth Theatre will be welcoming back over 100 teenagers and young people aged between 11-18 (including 16-18 year olds) and with a great half/half mix of boys and girls to our Drama and Musical Theatre classes this week. Photographs below from our March 2025 production of Coram Boy.
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1K9MSUV5d4/?
    • https://www.nationalbooktokens.com/student-books?utm_medium=email&utm_source=nbt&utm_campaign=20250910-student-books&utm_content=win-250-gift-card 'Win one of five £250 National Book Tokens! Essential study guides to one-pot recipe books, epic fantasy to beloved Victorian classics... National Book Tokens empower students to choose exactly the books they need to write their next chapter in life. That's why we’re giving you the chance to win one of five £250 National Book Tokens to surprise a student at school, sixth form, college or university – the perfect gift to spend on books of their choice, whether for study or simply for fun (or both!).'
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...