Jump to content

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, tedfudge said:

I would leave the country if khan became  priminister 

Are you a very wealthy second home owner?

Do you have dual nationality?

It's not that easy to leave your country if you're neither of these. 

Where would you go?

On 15/09/2025 at 19:43, Rockets said:

Should we change the title to Is Starmer toast?

The real infighting is just starting: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgy79yr74do

Wouldn't you like Labour to turn things around, preferably under Starmer, at least for the time being?  Otherwise, seeing as the Tories are useless, you are throwing your hand in with Farage.  I'm sure that most of us on this site really don't want that.

  • vladi changed the title to Will Starmer join Mandelson in the toast rack?
10 hours ago, malumbu said:

Wouldn't you like Labour to turn things around, preferably under Starmer, at least for the time being?  Otherwise, seeing as the Tories are useless, you are throwing your hand in with Farage.  I'm sure that most of us on this site really don't want that.

Personally, I would like to see labour do something positive for the country, unfortunately under Starmer and Reeves the opposite is true. Change of leadership.is now required, not a general election at this stage but if Starmer and Reeves stay in post then the May local elections will give Reform more power. 

Now is the time for change and damage limitation , not after May when large number of reform local councillors will be voted in as a protest against this Government. 

When did this whole “elect a govt and then change leaders as we see fit “ notion take hold ?

it didn’t help the Tories and it won’t help Labour 

(and why do people think they can change leaders, call new elections on a whim, but NEVER EVER talk about changing Brexit) 

I dont think starmer is doing a good job. But he was elected. And the volatile electorate wanting short term fixes are part of the reason behind his ultra-cautiousness 

Complaining about govt and suggesting change of direction seem fine to me. Demanding a change of leader not so much 

that being said, if there was some Labour implosion and someone like Burgon was in some mad scenario made leader, then I think the electorate should be entitled to a general election. Just as it should have happened when Johnson was replaced 

There has been a number of achievements, but drowned out due to:

Bloody awful comms from the government

Some daft decisions and initiatives, then either digging themselves into a hole and/or turning

For example the well off should not get winter fuel allowance, benefit needs to be reformed and rich farmers should not get tax breaks, but we now how all that went 

Employers national insurance - money has to be raised from somewhere but that is the difficult question

The image from the right wing press has now stuck, propagated by traditional and social media.

And then some appalling acts of self harm.

We of course all know better, but I do wonder about the competence of those advising him.

  • Agree 1

"Country before Party" is Starmer's motto. Lucy Powell, Burnham and other senior cabinet ministers briefing against Starmer, describing the situation as 'terminal', and publicly condemning him is not putting the country first. They'll be no better than the Tories if they enforce on us a new PM and the political dissatisfaction of the electorate will explode. 

Labour needs to get its house in order, but there are too many factions and, just like the Tories at the end, it doesn't know what it is anymore. I think the situation is unsolvable. 

 

One of the issues is that under this government, the so called black hole of £20 billion has, according to some, risen to £50 billion. Which will result in even more taxes.

I was always taught to cut my coat according to my cloth, which would in an ideal world mean having to halt or stop projects or services until the deficit is down to a manageable level. Increasing taxes has a limit (the Laffer Curve https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laffer_curve)  and also damages the economy and the publics ability to spend. 

If Labour want to turn things around they are going to have to face some uncomfortable decisions on where to cut their ambition.

25 minutes ago, Sephiroth said:

Running

a

country

is

not

the

same

as

a

household

budget


 

No

One

Said

It 

Was 

However spending money you haven't got and increasing national debt is not a great way to run a country now is it ? Or has common sense left you 🤔 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...