Jump to content

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, tedfudge said:

I would leave the country if khan became  priminister 

Are you a very wealthy second home owner?

Do you have dual nationality?

It's not that easy to leave your country if you're neither of these. 

Where would you go?

On 15/09/2025 at 19:43, Rockets said:

Should we change the title to Is Starmer toast?

The real infighting is just starting: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgy79yr74do

Wouldn't you like Labour to turn things around, preferably under Starmer, at least for the time being?  Otherwise, seeing as the Tories are useless, you are throwing your hand in with Farage.  I'm sure that most of us on this site really don't want that.

  • vladi changed the title to Will Starmer join Mandelson in the toast rack?
10 hours ago, malumbu said:

Wouldn't you like Labour to turn things around, preferably under Starmer, at least for the time being?  Otherwise, seeing as the Tories are useless, you are throwing your hand in with Farage.  I'm sure that most of us on this site really don't want that.

Personally, I would like to see labour do something positive for the country, unfortunately under Starmer and Reeves the opposite is true. Change of leadership.is now required, not a general election at this stage but if Starmer and Reeves stay in post then the May local elections will give Reform more power. 

Now is the time for change and damage limitation , not after May when large number of reform local councillors will be voted in as a protest against this Government. 

When did this whole “elect a govt and then change leaders as we see fit “ notion take hold ?

it didn’t help the Tories and it won’t help Labour 

(and why do people think they can change leaders, call new elections on a whim, but NEVER EVER talk about changing Brexit) 

I dont think starmer is doing a good job. But he was elected. And the volatile electorate wanting short term fixes are part of the reason behind his ultra-cautiousness 

Complaining about govt and suggesting change of direction seem fine to me. Demanding a change of leader not so much 

that being said, if there was some Labour implosion and someone like Burgon was in some mad scenario made leader, then I think the electorate should be entitled to a general election. Just as it should have happened when Johnson was replaced 

There has been a number of achievements, but drowned out due to:

Bloody awful comms from the government

Some daft decisions and initiatives, then either digging themselves into a hole and/or turning

For example the well off should not get winter fuel allowance, benefit needs to be reformed and rich farmers should not get tax breaks, but we now how all that went 

Employers national insurance - money has to be raised from somewhere but that is the difficult question

The image from the right wing press has now stuck, propagated by traditional and social media.

And then some appalling acts of self harm.

We of course all know better, but I do wonder about the competence of those advising him.

  • Agree 1

"Country before Party" is Starmer's motto. Lucy Powell, Burnham and other senior cabinet ministers briefing against Starmer, describing the situation as 'terminal', and publicly condemning him is not putting the country first. They'll be no better than the Tories if they enforce on us a new PM and the political dissatisfaction of the electorate will explode. 

Labour needs to get its house in order, but there are too many factions and, just like the Tories at the end, it doesn't know what it is anymore. I think the situation is unsolvable. 

 

One of the issues is that under this government, the so called black hole of £20 billion has, according to some, risen to £50 billion. Which will result in even more taxes.

I was always taught to cut my coat according to my cloth, which would in an ideal world mean having to halt or stop projects or services until the deficit is down to a manageable level. Increasing taxes has a limit (the Laffer Curve https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laffer_curve)  and also damages the economy and the publics ability to spend. 

If Labour want to turn things around they are going to have to face some uncomfortable decisions on where to cut their ambition.

25 minutes ago, Sephiroth said:

Running

a

country

is

not

the

same

as

a

household

budget


 

No

One

Said

It 

Was 

However spending money you haven't got and increasing national debt is not a great way to run a country now is it ? Or has common sense left you 🤔 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...