Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2) Where black people ARE discriminated against, it's often CLASS and not race that's the main factor. (This doesn't make it any better, but is important)


3) The problem with young black males' lack of role models (see my post above about the black male crisis of masculinity).



I'm sorry, I could not disagree with you more, completely and utterly WRONG. And last I will say on subject matter.

I don't see what is so controversial about this. Please expand Muffin, I am interested to know your thoughts.


For the reasons I described earlier, far fewer black people have broken into the middle and upper-middle classes. This is a historical factor. Privilege and wealth are entrenched and handed down in this country - just as poverty and social exclusion is, irrespective of race. The relatively small black middle class in Britain show this country up for its lack of social mobility in general. Put simply, if you're born into poverty in Britain you'll probably stay poor, whether you're white or black. Sad but true.


Secondly, young black males' lack of role models. I think it's really sad that people won't address the cultural issues here for fear of being seen as un-pc. For as long as we ignore the elephant in the drawing room, too many black boys will continue to be drawn into a miserable life of crime. This is not racist; it is the very opposite in fact. We are talking about cultural and historical factors here that have their root in the evils of colonialism and slavery.

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> 1) Gay working-class people. A huge proportion of

> these people have to keep quiet about their

> sexuality


i guess that some might see this as a luxury - being able to 'keep quiet' when it's convenient/necessary


> All this goes to show that there are complex

> cultural factors to take into account.


all these issues re prejudice of any kind are very complex - it's why i think to simplify them to say one type is better/worse than another is never really going to work

James please explain WHY Kalamity's remark is silly? It's a very valid point when it comes to the dreaded topic of "racism". It's not just black people who suffer from racist issues and certainly not in the class circles you keep mentioning. I dont know, maybe my circles and backgrounds (people I associate with) are different from yours hence I can not identify with the problems you see on a daily basis.

Making issues such as you are with "black people" is really diverting the attention away from the initial topic of this thread... gay people find it harder than those of different ethnic backgrounds? Really? Doesn't seem that way by your own replies.

Um, actually the title of this thread is "homophobia compared with racism."


It is not "homophobia is worse than racism." Read it properly!


I am not "making issues" with black people. I am explaining waht I see as profound and interesting differences in people's experiences.


Try reading my posts properly instead of letting rip with your knee-jerk attacks and you'll se that we are pretty much 'on the same side'!

The interesting bit is how racial and religious 'minorieties' (I use 'quotes' because some are actually majorities in pure number terms) are usually the loudest to complain about mistreatment (fair) and the worst homophobes.


While many attack James for suggesting one may be worse, and I don't think he's said that, truth is what makes homophobia more challenging is you get no solidarity from many other oppressed groups.


It's hard to be gay. It's hard to be black. Try being black and gay. Poor souls.

Well, I am assuming that like me you would like the world to be a fairer place. That you don't want to live in a country where people are treated differently, have different life-chances or suffer harrassment because of their sex, age, sexual orientation or the colour of their skin.


Is that right?

Yes James I would dearly love the world to be a fairer place and if you agree too then I kindly ask you to accept/respect other people's (not meaning mine but generally throughout this forum) opinions. Even if you agree or not there is no need for upsetting fellow human beings.

I've had my run-ins with James in the past only to find that, more often than not, it's been a misunderstanding of tone.


I've not met the guy (to my knowledge anyway) but I suspect we would get on just fine (notwithstanding dogs... ooh is he ever precious about them! ;-) )


I can see why people have got upset with some of the posts, but I think the truest one is when he says that he does not want to "live in a country where people are treated differently, have different life-chances or suffer harrassment because of their sex, age, sexual orientation or the colour of their skin. "


I think the thread started after Muffintop's post re: the 2 commuters comments and James felt that the general levels of support shown wouldn't have been as forthcoming had he post about the latest heckle he received. I would disagree with that - I reckon this place, being full of wooly minded lefties (allegedly - I reckon the balance is much wider than that) would have been quick to rally and offer cups of tea. But by starting this thread, inviting comparisons re: racism etc... is it necessary? It feels a bit like a meeting in Tooting circa 1979 ( ok, I was 11 and living in a different country in 1979 but hey! I read my NME)

KB - don't understand why what I've said is upsetting. Sorry. To be honest I feel a bit ganged up on by people who don't actually understand what I'm saying.


Sean - diplomatic and sage as ever. I think you have understood perfectly what I meant! Thanks for your generosity of spirit.

Sorry James I dont mean to say I find anything in particular you have said upsetting to me personally only that, and again I'm speaking across the board not just on this thread, that your tone/response seems to have upset a few people. Also, your tone of writing suggests who have grumbles with several forumites without a justified reason (disagree if you like) and so think some of your comments towards others are a bit unnecessary - quick to judge and very denfensive on yourself..

I know I writing in circular patterns here but I find it difficult communicating with you and not end up in an argument.

"the measure of intelligence is the capacity to hold two seemingly conflicting ideas in your head at the same time" some bright spark wrote something like that somewhere at some time. I thnk it pertinent here.


I'm impressed by people's attempts to make an even handed assessment of the effects of homophobia and racism. a tricky equation if ever. I'm less impressed by any post that seems to want to diminish the effect of either.

Wow deep thinking there Citz and agree whole heartedly.


James it would seem we both have gotten off the the wrong feet on many many many occassions here. Whilst I don't appreciate your over judgemental attitude towards me (no please don't argue about it as clearly this is how I personally percieve it) I would like to express I have no issue with you at all.


You may think others are attacking you, I assure you not coz of ur sexuality and such, but this is open debate and opinions do tend to fly around in all directions from both sides of the "argument".


Just thought I would point that out :)

I pretty much abhor any hateful comments. Racist, sexist etc. It's not always what is said - it's the way it is said. We've got into some very protracted debates on this forum over that - *Bob* vs Atila springs to mind - how that all blew up because the comment was typed not said, so it's inflection was misinterpreted.


I think hate is the key element here.

I suppose part of the problem is that body language & facial expressions are such a huge percentage of communication that words alone are much more 'dangerous' in terms of how they can be interpreted.


In case anyone has misunderstood, I'm not "diminishing the effects" of either racism or homophobia. To suggest that is a bit of a cheap shot, in my opinion. Sad that some people are so quick to attack someone when they haven't quite grasped what they are saying.


Reread my posts - I can't be bothered to repeat it all here!

James, I have just read a lot of this thread whilst at work and my poor, end-of-the-week brain is not processing properly so sorry if I am someone who has not grasped what you were saying. Just to say repeat that I dislike anything hateful said to anyone. Trouble is that you have invited people to compare these two very nasty phenomena and I'm going to presume that some people will earnestly come out saying that the sum total effect of Racism is worse than the sum total effect of homophobia.

One of the things I am interested in is the aspect of class and oppression accross all oppressed groups.


When feminists say that women were treated worse than men, they need to look at in context of class. Upper class women were not treated as badly as working class men. Women property owners got the vote a long time before landless men.


In today's society if you are rich enough or climb to the top of whichever greasy pole is yours, you will be accepted amongst the elite if you are female, non-white or gay.


If you are from a working class background you can still make it to the top if you are willing to copy the master, distance youreslf from your roots and be as ruthless as the elite, but if you are poor, no matter what colour/sex/sexuality you are, you will still be looked on as sub-human by the elite but it is deeply unpopular to mention class oppression. Since Mrs Thatcher's defeat of the unions and the working class, the oppression of the poor has gone on unabaited.


Unless we get more people willing to fight for the seemingly undeserving poor and 'chavs' I can't see any end to the oppression of all the oppressed sub-sets within this underclass of our society and of the world.

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't see what is so controversial about this.

> Please expand Muffin, I am interested to know your

> thoughts.

>

> For the reasons I described earlier, far fewer

> black people have broken into the middle and

> upper-middle classes. This is a historical factor.

> Privilege and wealth are entrenched and handed

> down in this country - just as poverty and social

> exclusion is, irrespective of race. The relatively

> small black middle class in Britain show this

> country up for its lack of social mobility in

> general. Put simply, if you're born into poverty

> in Britain you'll probably stay poor, whether

> you're white or black. Sad but true.

>

> Secondly, young black males' lack of role models.

> I think it's really sad that people won't address

> the cultural issues here for fear of being seen as

> un-pc. For as long as we ignore the elephant in

> the drawing room, too many black boys will

> continue to be drawn into a miserable life of

> crime. This is not racist; it is the very opposite

> in fact. We are talking about cultural and

> historical factors here that have their root in

> the evils of colonialism and slavery.


James, what you say seems to make perfect sense to me. However as you are white you may never have any opinions, ask any questions nor in fact talk about black people except to apologise.


Regarding racism and homophobia at school - yes its wrong. However so is kids picking on other kids for being ugly, foreign, short, fat, skinny, ginger, smart or stupid. Kids can be nasty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello My name is Lizzie and I work locally as a dog walker and nanny. I won’t be needed over Summer so will have full availability for a dogsitting job. I have a DBS certificate and will provide several dogsitting references as well. Please note that I can only watch your pet at your home since they are sadly not allowed in my flat! Looking forward to hear from you
    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...