Jump to content

‘Welcome’ Donald Trump to Windsor when he arrives there tomorrow (Tuesday 16th September)


Recommended Posts

By now you’ve hopefully seen that our main demonstration against Trump’s state visit is in London on Wednesday.

Many of you have also asked, though, about how you can help ‘welcome’ Donald Trump to Windsor when he arrives there tomorrow (Tuesday) evening. So here’s the plan:

We’re asking you to come and line Windsor High Street tomorrow in a peaceful, static protest. 

Time: 6pm, Tue 16 Sept
Location: Assemble outside Windsor Parish Church, High St, Windsor SL4 1LS and then spread out along the High Street.

Grab some cardboard and a pen and make a homemade sign to show Donald Trump and his supporters what you think of them! 

The world’s media will be in Windsor to cover the state visit, so showing visually that he is not welcome will send an important message far and wide.

If you are coming then please join this Signal chat group for important updates.
143887fd-0cc6-afb5-df6a-8fe4b410d850.jpg
 
 

Protest safety

  • Please buddy up and come with someone else
  • You have a right to peacefully demonstrate, but we are expecting a high police presence. Remain non-violent and non-confrontational, and do not talk to the police.
  • It may be better to dress inconspicuously, not like an ‘activist’
  • We plan on ending at 7.30pm. Please leave in groups of 5–10 and make sure you have a bust card
This action is entirely legal but we still recommend that you read this key advice when going on a protest to know your rights. Remember: 
  • No comment
  • No personal details
  • Ask ‘under what power?’
  • No duty solicitor
  • Don’t accept a caution
Here is the protest support line: 07946 541 511 and here is more information on Stop & Search under the Public Order Act.
 
Thank you for being part of the movement against Trump.

In solidarity,

Stop Trump Coalition

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Stop Trump Coalition wrote at 19.53 on 15 September:

> Many of you have also asked,  though,

>  about how you can help ‘welcome’ 

> Donald Trump to Windsor when he

> arrives there tomorrow (Tuesday)

> evening. So here’s the plan:

 

You presume.  Why are you posting this here?

Edited by ianr
8 hours ago, ianr said:

Stop Trump Coalition wrote at 19.53 on 15 September:

> Many of you have also asked,  though,

>  about how you can help ‘welcome’ 

> Donald Trump to Windsor when he

> arrives there tomorrow (Tuesday)

> evening. So here’s the plan:

 

You presume.  Why are you posting this here?

It's the lounge.

Aren't we allowed to post anything (within reason)?

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

He's the leader of the largest super power on the planet

He's been invited

He was voted for by a majority of Americans

Nothing we can do to change any of the above

You may not like him being here but there is really nothing that can be done to stop this happening

No, I'm not a Trump fan either, however it's going to happen and he'll soon be gone and back on his way to the US of A. 

41 minutes ago, jazzer said:

He's the leader of the largest super power on the planet

He's been invited

He was voted for by a majority of Americans

Nothing we can do to change any of the above

You may not like him being here but there is really nothing that can be done to stop this happening

No, I'm not a Trump fan either, however it's going to happen and he'll soon be gone and back on his way to the US of A. 

It's a peaceful protest telling Trump he isn't welcome. Or at least, telling him that he and his views are not welcomed here by everybody.

It is obviously not going to change Trump's presence here.

It is just sending a message to him.

I feel very sorry for everyone who has got to grit their teeth and be nice to him. I even feel sorry for Keir Starmer 🤣

Edited by Sue
  • Like 1
6 hours ago, Sue said:

 

I feel very sorry for everyone who has got to grit their teeth and be nice to him. I even feel sorry for Keir Starmer 🤣

Camilla's sinuses are playing up again, so she's missing the Duchess of Kent's funeral this afternoon, but plans to 'participate fully' in the Trump visit.

Mmm. She wouldn't be looking for an excuse, would she?

An afternoon bent over a washing-up bowl of boiling water and Olbus Oil, with a tea towel on your head should clear that up.

Maybe a dab of Vicks on your nightie tonight.

Edited by David Peckham
Clarity
5 hours ago, Sue said:

It is obviously not going to change Trump's presence here.

It is just sending a message to him.

You are right . It isn't going to change him for the better. Sending such a negative message is potentially counter-productive.

Trump is narcissistic, arrogant, unpredictable, spiteful, divisive, and dishonest, with a penchant for a total a disregard for democratic norms. 

He is one who bears a grudge so there's a case to be made for not offending him as he could react with a bunch of  adverse actions  such as  deciding to increase import tariffs on UK exports to the US.
 
 


 

Trump.jpg

  • Agree 1
29 minutes ago, vladi said:

You are right . It isn't going to change him for the better. Sending such a negative message is potentially counter-productive.

Trump is narcissistic, arrogant, unpredictable, spiteful, divisive, and dishonest, with a penchant for a total a disregard for democratic norms. 

He is one who bears a grudge so there's a case to be made for not offending him as he could react with a bunch of  adverse actions  such as  deciding to increase import tariffs on UK exports to the US.
 
 


 

Trump.jpg

I was replying to Jazzer, who said it wasn't going to change Trump's presence here.

However, you are also obviously right, and also  nothing will change Trump for the better. And yes, this could be counter productive.

But I'm sure the silver tongued Keir Starmer will be able to smooth things over. Not to mention the King and Queen 🤢 

I think it's right that people should feel able to make their feelings known.

It appears to be  a peaceful and well planned demonstration, and presumably they won't be bringing out the Baby Trump inflatable again, which must be well deflated by now.

Sue said "But I'm sure the silver tongued Keir Starmer will be able to smooth things over. Not to mention the King and Queen 🤢" 

Starmer dithers and is unable to make any decision and when he finally does he gets in massively wrong and duly backtracks.

The guy is a liability and clown who the country needs rid off before he taxes us to heaven whilst bankrupting the country. 

And as he's flying in and around Windsor for two days, I do hope they've got the skies covered as he's a sitting duck.

Edited by jazzer
  • Agree 1

'Many of you have also asked, though, about how you can help ‘welcome’ Donald Trump to Windsor when he arrives there tomorrow (Tuesday) evening. So here’s the plan:'

 

I'm just watching Trump's arrival at Stansted.

Apparently, he's spending tonight at the US Ambassador's house in Regent's Park.


'The world’s media will be in Windsor to cover the state visit, so showing visually that he is not welcome will send an important message far and wide.'

Not really. They're in Essex.

Could be a long wait for some quite pissed off people in Windsor. He's not due there until tomorrow.

Edited by David Peckham
Clarity
  • Agree 1

Mad to see everyone from business leaders and people on here look at someone like that and say we just have to doff a cap

 

and yet people will go on a march and listen to a fascist like Musk say we need to overthrow U.K. govt and be cool with that too

curious 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...