Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The DfT announced the opening of bids for the new combined Southern, Thameslink and Great Northern franchise which will start in September 2014 for Thameslink and Great Northern, the shared FCC/Southeastern service to Sevenoaks in December 2014 and Southern in July 2015.


As part of the new franchise, the new franchisee will take over management of the recently renovated Denmark Hill, Nunhead and stations along the Catford route from Dec 2014. Peckham Rye, East Dulwich and North Dulwich will be managed by the new franchisee in July 2015, while Forest Hill and Honor Oak Park will stay with London Overground.


Denmark Hill is surprising as London Overground will still provide the majority of services post the Thameslink 'improvements' as the peak requirement for the news.


More info and downloads on the Gov.UK website. Warning, one of the documents is 243 pages long.


https://www.gov.uk/government/news/essex-thameside-and-thameslink-southern-and-great-northern-invitations-to-tender-published

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Remember, you never know what someone else is going through behind closed doors....
    • Is anyone else having difficulty booking Silver Swim sessions (Tuesday and Thursday between 3pm-4pm?) Almost all the spaces are taken before the online booking system opens at 10pm several days before. Last night there appeared to be one space available for next Tuesday. I tried to book at one second past 10pm but was unsuccessful. This seems to have been a recent phenomenon. I made a telephone call this morning but just received a recorded message saying that the voicemail box was full. Am I right in assuming that in person bookings are now taking precedence over online ones?
    • I completely agree with you, Angelina. But it's worth noting that no one else has a problem with her, or finds her rude /  has mentioned her aggressively banging gates / ringing doorbells etc. 
    • But I don't think that was what you meant, was it? But he can hardly be held responsible for what somebody else did! Just discovered I forgot to post the above  last night, and now it's overtaken by long posts.  I don't have sufficient knowledge  to counter some of what has been said above, some of which appears to be opinion rather than facts, so it would be pointless for me to say anything else.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...