Jump to content

Maybe It?s Not Your Diet Or Exercise Regime That Needs Changing


Darren Gray

Recommended Posts

You realise that you need to lose weight ? either because of a visit to the doctor, or for the reason that quite simply your clothes no longer fit. You test something out, perhaps you experience a little improvement ? but it doesn?t last long and you find yourself slowly slipping back into old habits.


Maybe you stick to something for even a few months and turn up at your cousins wedding 3 stone lighter than when they saw you last year. But then unfortunately you relapse, and by the following Christmas you have your previous weight plus some. Sooner or later a new study or book comes out, or you see that cover on the celebrity magazine with all the bikinis or six packs and you decide it?s time to try again. You go onto the next thing to test, but the same thing happens and again, a few months later you?re back at square one. You get frustrated, angry with life and stressed so decide to just go back to your old ways.


?Why does it have to be so hard?? you ask yourself. However guess what- did you ever stop to think that if you continue changing diets and the regimes don?t work long-term maybe it?s not the diet or exercise routine that needs changing? Have you ever considered professional tailored guidance that combines effective behavioural change techniques with nutrition and exercise coaching to support you with education, motivation and self belief for the long-term?


If you would like further information please be in touch


Thank you for giving my thread your attention


Darren

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...