Advice on dealing with a solicitor who will not use modern means of communication

[malumbu]

A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there?

In fuller detail:

The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US. 

It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall.

The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively.

He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money.

We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts.

But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house.

However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more.

Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.  

Help!

 

 

 

 

[CPR Dave]

Are there any other executors?

Is the solicitor a soke practioner or part of a firm?

Are you and your fellow beneficiaries behaving well? 

You will want to take proper  legal advice (which this is not) but you can have an executor removed by the court if they are refusing to communicate with you.

I would just do that. Tell him you are doing it, tell him you have reported him to the Law Society (if you have) and tell him you will be challenging his fees with the legal services ombudsman. This all sounds outrageous to me and this solicitor doesn't sound fit to practice.

Three years sounds far too long for a low value estate comprising mostly of a house. He should have sold that or rented it out whilst he was waiting to administer the estate. 

 

Sounds like he has cost you all a lot of money.

 

[Rockets]

Have you complained to the solicitor directly and did they respond within the 8 weeks they have under their code of conduct - I presume they have and this is why you have escalated further to the SRA? If he doesn't respond in a timely fashion per the SRA code of conduct then I am sure they will need to take action.

[malumbu]

The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces.

He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence

Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us.

There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf.

There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team,

There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will.

I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment.

The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in.

I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.

[vladi]

It sounds like a horrendous situation and I truly sympathise. And to make it worse, he is probably handling other deceased estates in a similar manner.

Given that (1) the main beneficiary is  "the typical 'friend'" and (2) the main asset has diminished in value and continues to do so (3) he will be deducting fees then there may be be nor very much left at the end of it. That being the case, I would press the case against him through the Probate Registry.  to have him passed over using a citation process. 
 

[ianr]

That's interesting.   I see there are plenty of thumbnail descriptions available on the web, mainly from solicitor's practices,  of the types of citation.  I think this has the most detailed and circumspect one in some respects that I've seen so far. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/wills-and-probate/content/103565.   Other sites can probably help fill in the picture.

I like the word "intermeddling".  Never come across it before, not even in a crossword.

Edited 5 hours ago by ianr

[malumbu]

Thanks all, our hope was (despite the diminishing estate) he would get on with it.  Progress is glacial, it's been two years since probate was granted, that's two cold and damp winters with no heating, and not surprisingly a pipe burst.

He's blames the issues on the estate agent, who separately had a dispute with him, he had a wobbly when one of the beneficiaries spoke to the estate agent.  Separately he said it was the family's fault for letting the property get into a poor condition.  It was dated, but certainly not in poor condition.

There are two five star reviews on Google, and five one star:

** WARNING**
This solicitor firm has to be one of the worst I have encountered.
The solicitor is prehistoric in his practices and will carry out work at his own snails pace, the fax machine he uses gets turned off at 2 pm and its near impossible to get him on the phone.
STAY AWAY, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, check the solicitors ombudsman, this firm has previous bad practice recorded.

 

Disgusting under no circumstances use this solicitor.For over 10 years he has not carried out the terms of a Will he has not re-invested money but has retained it.  He writes letters which are pure "Flannel" excuses for doing nothing.  You have been warned

 

shocking experience, delayed the whole process, told other side solicitors to not contact him as he feels pressured etc. never use.

 

Not fit for 21st century. No website, no email address, no electronic transfer. Very slow, very little communication.

 

Was not a pleasant experience dealing with this firm

 

 

[Sue]

How on earth can someone like this be allowed to continue as a solicitor?

Can't he just be struck off, or the equivalent?

Edited 57 minutes ago by Sue
Typo