Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, HeadNun said:

True - many public schools feature regularly. Dulwich does stand out as one of schools that gets frequent mentions and nothing seemed to come of it. I think there was an investigation into a pupil at another London fee paying school, somewhere west, can't recall the name now. 

That wasn’t my point. My point is that Everyone’s Invited has submissions from across the full spectrum of educational establishments: state and private; junior, senior and universities. There are 108 pages of institutions with about 80 institutions per page. To say it is Dulwich College and maybe some other fee paying schools is wide of the mark in the extreme. 

I know, back when it was in the news, I read most of it. I said many public schools feature, I didn't say it was exclusively public schools. And Dulwich was one of the schools that stood out to me because I know it, and some of the stories I read stuck in my memory.

In the 1960s my husband went to a private day school, Although he was a bright child having won a couple of scholarships to other private schools, his father chose this particular one. He went from 11 - 14 years and left as unhappy with the set up which was based on ethnicity. All boys with both parents English were placed in the A stream regardless of academic ability, Boys with an Irish background were placed in B stream. All others were C streamed - this included boys with a Black or Asian  background, mixed race or mixed European background. His schooldays came to an end when he wished to learn Latin and he was told that no boy in C stream could participate in this subject. His father (not English) was very upset at this and withdrew him from the school and sent him  to a country boarding school.  The experiences he had with his schooling culminated in a breakdown of his mental health and several months in Maudsley. He had low self esteem and it took several decades for him to understand that it was the school system and not his ability which had failed him

  • Sad 3
2 hours ago, Mav said:

 To say it is Dulwich College and maybe some other fee paying schools is wide of the mark in the extreme. 

No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔

I've looked up previous media coverage and gather that the school warned pupils of the risk of police 'fines' for assembly under the extant Covid regulations.  Don't you think they might have felt it a duty, to both pupils and parents, to do so?

Edited by ianr
3 hours ago, Dogkennelhillbilly said:

Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive.

That’s interesting. I’d have thought limiting the conversation to a single school or small group of schools is far more dismissive of the true extent of the problem.

 

 

  • Like 1

OK - what would you like to say about how schools outside Dulwich have addressed bigoted or predatory behaviour by the students in the past or the present? It might make an interesting comparison to what Dulwich College has or hasn't done.

Discrimination isn't just through race, gender, age or sexuality. It can and IS because you have a surname that is not British, which they can't pronounce and then they attempt to discriminate until you pull them up.

And it still happens in 21st C England, even though but you where born, educated and worked here all your life and speak perfect English.  That's discrimination. 

Edited by jazzer

Fair point.  Most people can't pronounce Farage (as in rhymes with garage). Perhaps that explains his behaviour as a child as he was upset that people pronounced it in the continental way.  Maybe that is the reason we had Brexit.  Shame schools didn't take a more pastoral approach in those days.  Maybe he just needs a hug.

7 hours ago, jazzer said:

I wasn't referring to Farage. What I said is what I sometimes have to contend with, even TODAY. 

It's about othering (and also stereotyping), isn't it.

Unfortunately it seems to be a sort of human knee jerk reaction to perceived differences, which sadly has awful consequences for individuals and groups of people.

Unfortunately also some insecure people bait and bully other people because it makes them feel superior. 

"What we can unequivocally state is that the behaviours described are entirely at odds with the Dulwich college of today.”

...so says the head honcho of Dulwich College today. Obviously actions speak louder than words in this area.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/dec/11/dulwich-college-head-responds-to-claims-of-teenage-racism-by-nigel-farage

  • 2 weeks later...

In answer to the original question, the position of a teacher who worked at Dulwich College and raised concerns about Farage at the time, seems to be "yes - Dulwich College did tolerate bigotry and racism, and it was at the direction of the headteacher".

"I had previously taught in a large, culturally-diverse comprehensive school in Brent, with many Jewish colleagues and other staff of colour. It would have been unthinkable for such behaviours to have been tolerated there, or to have gone unpunished."

https://www.theguardian.com/news/ng-interactive/2025/dec/28/of-course-he-abused-pupils-ex-dulwich-teacher-speaks-out-about-farage-racism-claims

  • Like 2

I wonder where he could be deported to, Hungary the obvious candidate in Europe, perhaps he would get on well with Modi?

 

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage both said Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood should look at whether Abd El Fattah's citizenship could be revoked to enable his swift removal from the UK.

Farage said in a letter to Mahmood: "It should go without saying that anyone who possesses racist and anti-British views such as those of [Mr Abd El Fattah] should not be allowed into the UK."

So just racists views are ok Nige?

  • 2 weeks later...
On 08/12/2025 at 22:40, Dogkennelhillbilly said:

OK - what would you like to say about how schools outside Dulwich have addressed bigoted or predatory behaviour by the students in the past or the present? It might make an interesting comparison to what Dulwich College has or hasn't done.

Surprising (not surprising at all) that @Mavdidn't have anything to say about how schools other than Dulwich College handled bigotry or abuse, or any other related topic. I suppose they just didn't like Dulwich College being discussed for things that happened at Dulwich College...

Meanwhile, a second person (a pupil this time, and not a teacher) has come forward to say that they wrote to the head teacher of Dulwich College at the time to inform him of Farage's bigoted conduct. It has previously been reported that the head teacher was personally involved in selection of prefects, and that Farage was appointed a prefect.

If the head teacher was aware, and appointed/maintained Farage as prefect regardless instead of taking action, then I think we have the answer to our question: yes, Dulwich College did tolerate pupils' bigotry and racism.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jan/08/go-back-home-farage-schoolmate-accounts-bring-total-alleging-racist-behaviour-to-34

  • Agree 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Green Party policy on driver behaviour: Default 20mph Speed Limits: The party supports making 20 mph the default speed limit in all residential areas. 40mph Speed Limits: Proposing a default 40 mph speed limit in non-residential areas, excluding major roads. Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs): Promoting the expansion of LTNs to reduce "rat-running" in residential areas. Ending Internal Combustion Engine Sales: A target to end the sale of new petrol and diesel vehicles by 2030. Environmental Charging: Implementing a Carbon Tax on fossil fuels to increase the cost of petrol and diesel, incentivizing a shift to electric vehicles or public transport. Prioritizing Active Travel: Shifting funding from road building to walking, cycling, and public transport infrastructure, aiming for 50% of trips in towns and cities to be made by these methods by 2030. Improved Driver Training: Supporting "eco-driving" techniques to reduce emissions and fuel usage.  Some of which is good, some unrealistic, and on driver behaviour doesn't go far enough. Difficult to summarise the Lib Dems position as it is a bit wishy washy wanting to appeal to both the eco warrior and the NIMBY.  Sadly I know people who are both!
    • Why would you have to look for "a good reason to not vote for the greens"? What a very strange thing to say. Would you like to explain your logic?
    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...