Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have been uploading thoughts and ideas for a secular philosophy onto the EDF and Facebook.


No responses on facebook. Quite few, critical and creative, on EDF. There are sharks swimming in the murky waters of the EDF!


Here is my next contribution; I have been thinking about how a state would look if it positively embraced Secular thinking.


1. Disassociate the monarchy from the C of E and leave monarchs to choose their beliefs.

2. Review all of the decision making bodies of the State, and ensure that they are made up of a majority of secular thinkers, with no religious affinities or connections. (Including House of Lords and Parliament).

3. Remove the notion that everyone is by default C of E, from all administrative procedures. People should be able to opt in, and not be included by default.

4. In all Equal Opps procedures and law, recognise that members of the public can choose "no faith" and "Secular" in addition to the usual terms.

5. Ensure that all schools funded by the State, directly or indirectly, are secular, and not faith schools.

6. Establish a group to review decisions made by public authorities (Education, health etc) to ensure that they are secular in origin, outlook, intent and outcomes. (For example, it can be argued that the legislation encouraging faith schools is not!)

7. Establish a group to review the work of major players in the public domain (newspapers, charities, media, etc) and ensure that any faith based associations are made clear and evident. (Many charities and news organisations around the world do not declare their sources of funding, which are often faith driven. Many of the charities touting for your money on the street do not declare their faith background. Many "research" bodies are faith based, especialy in the political body).

8. Bring "Secular studies" onto the school curriculum, as a philosophy.

9. Make it an article of our constitution, that secularity is a fundamental part of it, and that the state can legitimately act to defend its "secularity". (To prevent "faith" based beliefs creeping into the state system, as they did during the development of our Empire, and of the USA; "Manifest Destiny" was used to present a faith based reason for the subjugation of many tribes, other peoples etc.)

10. I can't think of a 10th...yet!!


There you go. Responses welcome, but not too "sharkish" please!


R Gutsell

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/37010-a-secular-state/
Share on other sites

rgutsell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> 10. I can't think of a 10th...yet!!

>


>

> R Gutsell


How about a Notional Anthem?

One that's instantly recognisable and could have the lyrics reworked.


I'm throwing 'Secular Healing' by Marvin, gay, out there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...