Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Do feel a bit 'if you have to ask, you can't affrid it'... But in a bit of idle school searching, am looking at Alleyn's 11+ admissions. They have two academin scholarships:


1. Saddlers? Academic Scholarships are normally awarded to the six highestachieving Year 7 pupils on entry, based on their performance in the 11+ entrance

examination (written papers and scholarship interviews). Each award is worth up

to ?3000 per year. They are partly funded by the Worshipful Company of

Saddlers who, in addition to funding bursary places, wish to support academically

able candidates who will contribute markedly to the academic life of the School.


2.Academic Scholarships are awarded according to academic merit, and are worth

up to ?3000 per year.


Is it just me, or do they sound the same?


I have left it too late to be tiger mother for the first two I think. Might have a small chance at the exam, but in the interview would answer in monosyllables unless about Dr Who or Young James Bond.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/37047-alleyns-school-question/
Share on other sites

I think the main difference is kudos. The Saddlers scholar is the pupil who ?scored? highest during the 11+? My brother was the Saddler?s scholar for his year (I think there is only one per year but maybe mistaken). The only thing I witnessed from memory was a lot of expectation and pressure to achieve at that high level throughout the 7 years. It may not be that way now (this was the 90s) but I would imagine it is as Alleyn?s is now a better school than it was then and probably even harder to get in to...!

Saddlers' scholarships have slightly more kudos than foundation scholarships which have slightly more kudos than 'ordinary' scholarships. Several of each type are awarded and there are also sports, art and music scholarships. Everyone sits the entrance exam (even pupils already at the school) and everyone is eligible for a scholarship if they pass the criteria. Bursaries, on the other hand, are means-tested and can be up to 100% of the fees (including things like trips, instruments etc). You can apply for a bursary if you get a place based on your performance in the entrance exams and they are offered based on family need, ie means-tested. There's a similar system at 13+


I should say I don't work for Alleyn's, I just know how this works.

Well I would rather have it than not have it that's for sure!!

Occasionally parents go to several sources to seek assistance with school fees, such as charities ( for various reasons). If 4 of them give ?3K scholarships each them that would be a tremendous help. Also I think it is every year - so ?3k x 7 years= ?21k

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...