Should I buy a property that has multiple subsidence claims?

[annie2023]

I’m buying a property that has had three insurance claims in the past 20 years, with the most recent one within the last five years. Before making the purchase, I was told that the front bay window had subsidence caused by a public tree, which the council had removed, and a structural stability report was provided. This explanation seemed reasonable to me, so I made an offer, and it was accepted.

During the legal process, however, my solicitor discovered that the situation is actually more complicated. The property had a bay window subsidence claim in 2010 caused by several plants in the front garden, which the owner removed. Everything appeared fine for the next eleven years, but then subsidence was discovered again, this time due to a public tree. Despite the tree affecting the bay window, the council refused to remove it, so the issue is ongoing

All insurers have refused to provide cover for the property; only the current insurer might still accept it, depending on the underwriter’s assessment. I have no idea how expensive the premium could be — they won’t even provide a quote at this stage. They asked me to submit the full insurance claim schedule, which doesn’t look positive, and I doubt they will continue insuring the property. I have also instructed a specialist broker to find a specialist insurer for me.Imagine how frustrated my future buyer would be when I decide to sell.

In addition to this, the house has suspected drainage issues and a leaking incoming water main. The owner is aware of these problems but has been unable to carry out repairs—likely because Thames Water has not cooperated. Drainage issues are a nightmare for any buyer, and although the water main leak is less serious, it is still time-consuming to resolve with Thames Water.

The property is not cheap, and others paying the same price are buying homes with much better potential. I feel very frustrated by the number of insurance claims; I would honestly prefer if the seller had made none at all. If the insurance premium ends up being over £5,000 per year, I will definitely pull out—not because I cannot afford it, but because it would significantly reduce the pool of buyers when I eventually sell. There are plenty of straightforward properties on the market, and my budget is strong enough to choose among them. I feel very exhausted. I wasn’t even that interested in the property to begin with, and now I’ve ended up in this embarrassing situation. 

Edited 4 minutes ago by annie2023

[Sue]

Just pull out, if you can 

If the owners haven't been upfront with you about these things, what else might they not have told you?

Better to lose some money now than buy it  and regret it.

Plus as you say, what would happen if you wanted to sell the house in the future?

Also, an insurer who will insure you now may not necessarily continue to do so. I have had subsidence, my then insurer withdrew my insurance as a result of the claim, and I had to go through a specialist broker to get insured.

I would say it's just not worth the risk and the hassle, irrespective of the structural stability report (which presumably isn't a guarantee?)

And don't be embarrassed! None of this is your fault!

Edited 4 hours ago by Sue

[CPR Dave]

What Sue said, I would walk, no run, away from this purchase. 

It sounds like they have completely misled you as to the position with the subsidence and let you spend money on lawyers finding out the truth.

I would not transact with such people.

 

[the_hermit]

We sold a house with subsidence providing all the paper trail and narrative upfront.  The list price was a slight discount to similar properties without subsidence issues and we got a few offers.  That's the way to do it.

Be nice to the estate agent.  Try to find out how desperate the vendor is to sell.  If they're desperate and you factor in a subsidence AND a substantial dishonesty discount compared to similar properties there might still be an opportunity but seems unlikely.

 

[Sally Eva]

n addition to this, the house has suspected drainage issues and a leaking incoming water main. The owner is aware of these problems but has been unable to carry out repairs—likely because Thames Water has not cooperated. Drainage issues are a nightmare for any buyer, and although the water main leak is less serious, it is still time-consuming to resolve with Thames Water.

 

Many houses in london have shared drains. Ours runs along the back of the block of houses to a near by road as a shared drain it is the sole responsibility of TW to fix it. They will do this if you get heavy with them. If the house you are buying is like this, the current owners need to make TW fix it. You need a better explanation not just "TW not co-operating", why haven't they been legally forced to co-operated.

Sounds very 0dd indeed. I would not trust them. I am with Sue and CPR Dave

[annie2023]

14 minutes ago, the_hermit said:

We sold a house with subsidence providing all the paper trail and narrative upfront.  The list price was a slight discount to similar properties without subsidence issues and we got a few offers.  That's the way to do it.

Be nice to the estate agent.  Try to find out how desperate the vendor is to sell.  If they're desperate and you factor in a subsidence AND a substantial dishonesty discount compared to similar properties there might still be an opportunity but seems unlikely.

 

The price isn’t as cheap as probate properties, yet the condition is basically the same as those probate houses, and most properties do not have subsidence claim history. I told the agent I was looking for a probate property, but they still ended up recommending this one to me. I don’t dislike the estate agent, I think they genuinely didn’t know! but I was indeed led into this step by step. I don’t believe the seller will lower the price, and I don’t have the time to negotiate anyway. As I said, there are many straightforward houses out there. I’ll wait to see the insurance quotation and whether the seller is willing to fix the main water drainage issue before deciding on the next step.

13 minutes ago, Sally Eva said:

n addition to this, the house has suspected drainage issues and a leaking incoming water main. The owner is aware of these problems but has been unable to carry out repairs—likely because Thames Water has not cooperated. Drainage issues are a nightmare for any buyer, and although the water main leak is less serious, it is still time-consuming to resolve with Thames Water.

 

Many houses in london have shared drains. Ours runs along the back of the block of houses to a near by road as a shared drain it is the sole responsibility of TW to fix it. They will do this if you get heavy with them. If the house you are buying is like this, the current owners need to make TW fix it. You need a better explanation not just "TW not co-operating", why haven't they been legally forced to co-operated.

Sounds very 0dd indeed. I would not trust them. I am with Sue and CPR Dave

Yes, this is something that needs to be fixed, as it’s painful to deal with TW and deal with drainage issue

[Angelina]

drop your offer price dramatically and continue, or walk away.