Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was cycling home from work this afternoon and was overtaken by a police car, which not only had a siren and blue lights but an additional, overlying crazy sound track. I actually thought it was some young hooligans with a novelty gas-powered horn system. We live on Barry road and I dread these crazy cars tearing up and down at all hours. Is this extra layer of noise really needed?

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe they had their Iron Maiden CD playing full

> blast at the same time!


Not quite, but close.


I think they're designed to solve two problems.


The first problem is that those obliviously sitting in their nasty boxes with Iron Maiden, or Woman's Hour, turned up to 11 can't, or prefer not to, hear the sirens.


The second is that just blatting out a traditional siren noise is that, from some angles, it's difficult to tell where it's coming from and, in some circumstances, it'll become inaudible. (If you ever studied 'waves' in Science, you'll know that this happens, and that there's no interesting way of explaining it). Even if the Met wasn't yet bored of running people over, the mayor was getting tired of the headlines.


To get round these problems, they have two main tricks. The first is changing the frequency of the siren, swooping it up and down, which makes it, theoretically, more audible from different directions. The second is to use s smear of frequencies (that's the grinding noise) that can cut through at least through the mellifluous clamour of Iron Maiden.


Because they can't really have everything going on at once without deafening pedestrians and cyclists (not, I suspect, that Plod cares very much, but the manufacturers have lawyers), the sirens are now designed to do the different things in sequence, so they'll switch, sometimes fairly quickly, between a bit of siren, a bit of swoopy noise and the grindery stuff. Unfortunately, this isn't just funky but very effective, so we'll just have to get used to it.

I was caught in a stuck queue in the Blackwall Tunnel on Saturday and a police bike zoomed down and as it caught up with us bikers near the exit, the sound of it - echoing around and around the tunnel - was truly deafening even with a helmet on. and the lights bouncing around made one suddenly feel like being in the middle of a live video game. Temptation to race the police biker out the other side of the Tunnel was, thankfully, suppressed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • With slightly less respect  I have  watched the 1 hour video - he said what he said and he did what he did. And his faux-wink wink “no violence people” fools no one but fools. Are you a fool?    the bbc told the truth - and it’s a straight up lie to say otherwise. Did they edit and cut to the chase to make a point? Absolutely  and correctly  he was not edited to say things he didn’t say  I cannot believe you watched the entire video and are trying to say the bbc edit somehow misrepresented what he said and Back in the real world - did the nutters who showed up at the white house materialise because of a bbc edit ffs - have some self respect and recognise what’s going on 
    • Friends and family in the 'States always say how wonderful it is to be in Britain and see our news coverage.  It's all partisan out there. The BBC manages to simultaneously p off the left and the right so must be doing something right.
    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
    • Amazing work from Leon, doing out electrical survey and replacing our consumer board. Great communications, tidy work, reliable friendly and reasonably priced. A pleasure to have around and highly recommended. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...