Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Social housing tenants who sublet their properties are being warned they could face fines of up to ?50,000 and a prison sentence thanks to a new law.


The Prevention of Social Housing Fraud came into force on October 15th and gives local councils far reaching powers to prosecute tenancy fraudsters. Landlords will be able to recover the profits of illegal subletting and tenant caught breaking the law will lose their security of tenure permanently.


The new law?s been welcomed by local authorities and it?s anticipated that the government will introduce new powers for tenancy investigators, similar to those of benefit investigators.

Don't know if you are the same as me - but even if it's

not against the law - it was against the terms and conditions.


I know it happened once in ours (not B&B I thought ?) and assumed

it was being allowed as the property wouldn't sell - market has

changed now however.


The majority of lets with us were done by the housing association

when they couldn't fill by shared ownership !!



hpsaucey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does this include shared ownerships? It's been

> bugging me for ages that someone in our shared

> ownership block are letting one of their bedrooms

> and are letting it as a B n B. Never know who

> your going to meet on the stairs!

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Social housing tenants are entitled to take in a

> lodger with the permission of their landlord.

> Subletting is renting the whole property to

> someone else. It is subletting, not renting one

> of your rooms that is not allowed.


Ackowledge. But - to elaborate - physically separating off a room in your house with a new wall built and a lock to make it a separate entity and renting out this room on a nightly basis advertised on the internet isn't taking in a lodger presumably because they're not sharing the home (?) Guessing then it may not be against this new legislation but pretty sure it must be against tenancy agreements and sure as hell is against the spirit of shared ownership...

hpsaucey - If the person has made structural alterations to create a room for B&B occupation they would need to building control approval and have informed the London Fire Brigade. Have you reported this to your Housing Association as I find it hard to believe they would turn a blind eye to this kind of a breach of agreement?

tfwsoll Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> hpsaucey - If the person has made structural

> alterations to create a room for B&B occupation

> they would need to building control approval and

> have informed the London Fire Brigade. Have you

> reported this to your Housing Association as I

> find it hard to believe they would turn a blind

> eye to this kind of a breach of agreement.


Thanks for the info tfwsoll,


Hadn't thought about the building regs and London Fire Brigade - good points! Apparently our Housing Association are cracking down on these sorts of occurrences in general so we will see.....

The owner will also in be in breach of their mortgage conditions. Housing Associations were more flexible where the market made it difficult to sell but in London this is no longer the case. As the rental market is so strong and the scheme wasn't designed as a business making opportunity, HA's are taking a tougher line line but they can only crack down if they know about it so I hope you have told them!

tfwsoll Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The owner will also in be in breach of their

> mortgage conditions. Housing Associations were

> more flexible where the market made it difficult

> to sell but in London this is no longer the case.

> As the rental market is so strong and the scheme

> wasn't designed as a business making opportunity,

> HA's are taking a tougher line line but they can

> only crack down if they know about it so I hope

> you have told them!



Hi there - have pm'd you...


H

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...