Jump to content

Recommended Posts

strae Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

If an independent high street is

> thriving, how does it come to be slowly and surely

> taken over by chains?


Sometimes because, as an area gets more successful/prosperous, the shop Landlords (most of the business premises on the Lane are rented rather than owned) increase rents to the point where only a chain, able to subsidise high rents with tax breaks and other corporate strategies, can afford them.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> strae Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> If an independent high street is

> > thriving, how does it come to be slowly and

> surely

> > taken over by chains?

>

> Sometimes because, as an area gets more

> successful/prosperous, the shop Landlords (most of

> the business premises on the Lane are rented

> rather than owned) increase rents to the point

> where only a chain, able to subsidise high rents

> with tax breaks and other corporate strategies,

> can afford them.



Yep, economies of scale mean that you reduce unit costs and increase your margins - making it possible to afford the bigger rents. A sole trader, even one that is popular, may struggle to compete.

Strae you are not understanding the point of chains vs. indies.


The chains can afford to offer cheaper products because of the economies of scale. Indies have to charge more as they are producing less.


People may vote with their feet, but there's a lot more to it than that.

Hi Angharad_L,


My point is exactly re economies of scale - i.e. we make choices as customers and these choices have consequences for us and the high street. If we want to keep a high street full of uniques / independents / smaller businesses, there is a "cost" to that, because we would need to pay more / lose out on the economies of scale and scope that larger chains may be able to offer.


The other argument is trivial, i.e. if we could choose between a corporate chain and a local business at the same price for the same quality, we would not be having this debate, because then it would come down purely to personal (subjective) preference and there is no point debating because lovers of red will not be able to convince lovers of blue and vice versa.


The point I was trying to make was simply acknowledging that I am torn between the best deal for my bank balance (cheaper prices) vs what I would ideally like (a thriving high street of independent shops, at potentially higher prices) and I think this is a choice we all ultimately make. So in a way, WE (more than the shops themselves) are responsible for the way our high street turns out. If we want more independent shops, we should support them with our custom. We shouldn't blame or demonise the chains for trying to provide goods and services at good prices - and clearly if they take over the high street, then there must be enough customers who prefer that.


I for one, will try my best to spend as much time (and money!) as possible in the shops I enjoy and wish all the plucky people who try and start something on North Cross, LL, Bellenden etc the very best. Long may it last!

At the risk of being a bit geeky about it, when considering competition (especially between retailers) the classic analysis is based on PQRS - Price, Quality, Range and Service - which better reflects the reality of how consumers choose than considering price alone. Successful independents compete strongly on the 'QRS' elements or they go to the wall.


Unfortunately this doesn't address the issue re commercial landlords seeking ever higher rents, but, with various premises in LL and elsewhere empty at the moment, you would hope that landlords might not be quite so ambitious.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I still have a landline and the set of Panasonic cordless phones I have are on their last legs.  One display screen is broken. If you have a used set available, let me know.   John Lewis used to sell them but no longer.  
    • I personally, just lost respect as this is not the time to.disrupt hospitals and put additional strain on stretched resources.  BBC News - Doctors vote to go ahead with this week's five-day strike https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c246dnyjylqo
    • I'm guessing that most people with pets would not bring either the pets or fireworks into their day to day conversations, to complain or otherwise. Are you suggesting that only "timid" pets are scared by fireworks? What evidence do you have for that, exactly?  Or are you equating being scared of fireworks with being "timid"? And what about the foxes and other wildlife? Is it ok for them to be scared? Firework noise is not a noise that "comes with normal city living" ! What a very strange thing to say! Are you one of the people who have been constantly letting off fireworks recently? I'm assuming you don't have any pets yourself, or you wouldn't have these opinions, but if you do have pets, please share how they react when they hear loud bangs. Unless they are goldfish, in which case you probably wouldn't be able to tell.
    • Well, I know a lot of people in London with pets and I've never heard any of them complain about fireworks.  Maybe what's not ok is keeping timid animals in a metropolis when they are scared of the noises that come with normal city living.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...