Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not gloating just taking the proverbial, whilst United remain in the Premiership I hardly think their "Glory Days" are over- There is definitely something not right at The Swamp, it's not as though it's a brand new squad trying to gel. Moyes is out of his depth imo but taking over from Fergie was always going to be a hard position to be in for anyone.
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

And Mr Medic.



I think Moyes is the right choice for United if that's what happens. Though he might not have the immediate respect Jose would have from everyone as his success is measured on a different set of scales to SAF and Jose, there are a lot of young players at United who will respect him as the boss as they still want to make it at United. Most of the older players seem to respect the Club enough for them not to continue to give whatever they have.




Do MU fans still feel the same?


Heard one guy on 606 pointing out that Moyes won nothing at Everton. well we all know that but maybe the penny has dropped on how important that is.

Did you watch that game Mick? United were very good to start with. Chelsea got lucky with their goal. The rest is history. This is an interesting article from the FT, though if what I read recently is correct only 10% on United's shares are on the stock market.


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f33253f0-79f5-11e3-a3e6-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2qs6nX6sB

Not the case at all, nothing in that article says that Maine Road had a capacity of 35,000 City gates averaged 28,000 (even when in 3rd Division) after the Manchester Commonwealth games we moved into Etihad in 2003 (Eastlands or CoMS as we called it) and capacity was increased to just under 50,000 so of course there are more bums on seats. To increase capacity to 61,000 could be a big mistake unless safe standing is introduced.

All seated stadia are not what football should be about, the atmosphere at Dulwich Hamlet is often better than OT,Emirates,WHL,Etihad etc.

When OT expanded in 2006 (76,000) they, again, got more bums on seats but they struggle to fulfill that capacity week in week out. There needs to be a major reduction in ticket prices so average Joe can go regularly.

I know I take the p*ss out of Red Devil/Laddy Muck but that's just banter, getting to a home game for us costs an absolute fortune, it's not exactly easy/cost effective to go to a London game either, I've budgeted ?80 for tomorrow at West Ham.

I had to pay ?79 for my ticket against West Ham in the Cup. Bloody fortune and we lost too. Ouch!.

Speaking of Dulwich Hamlet. I finally got to a game there on Saturday for the first time since I was a kid in the 60s/early 70s. Great atmosphere and the quality of the football impressed me. They have a very good number ten. I'll be back there next weekend against Harrow. COYD!

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did you watch that game Mick? United were very

> good to start with. Chelsea got lucky with their

> goal. The rest is history. This is an interesting

> article from the FT, though if what I read

> recently is correct only 10% on United's shares

> are on the stock market.

>

> http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f33253f0-79f5-11e3-a3e6-

> 00144feabdc0.html#axzz2qs6nX6sB



I watched the game, and thought Chelsea were far superior throughout. Theyn were slaughtering United down the left.

as Alan has posted a paywall link this is pretty much the same article, but free http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2014/jan/14/manchester-united-share-price-david-moyes-premier-league


sooner United can rid themselves of the Glazers the better for the club---sh*t I mean long live the Glazers, momentarily lapse

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry but I think it's best if people just check things for themselves when they buy things. In three shops/restaurants (from some years back) I just avoid the places concerned, as in all three  cases I was pretty sure it wasn't a genuine mistake, and in one case it happened more than once and usually late at night.
    • Sorry Sue - me again. This has been on my mind all day, it's a big bug bear of mine. If you don't mind - please can you private message me some of these shops so I can cross reference / add to my AVOID list.  Thanks in advance. Let's make sure this doesn't happen this Christmas, particularly as we head into sales season. Even more problematic in my experience.
    • Pity you didn't quote what you are referring to, Mal. I didn't see the previous post, and my mind is boggling 😮
    • The Cherry Tree was absolutely excellent for a while when a youngish couple ran it and brought in a really good chef. It was them who renamed it The Cherry Tree. They were really turning it around. The chef did fantastic Scotch eggs, and one of the best roasts I've ever had. If memory serves the then owner,  for some reason known only to himself, took a dislike to them and what they were doing and sacked them all. And yes we weren't expecting a top class  meal last Christmas, and we left it too late to book anywhere else, but we weren't expecting it for a hundred pounds EACH to be quite as terrible as it was. Stupid us. Not sure why you are confused by my post, Jazzer? Did I misremember? Now it's got even more confusing because my posts have been merged and your confused emoji is shown at the bottom of the second one instead of the first 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...