Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh grief, can't believe I can't stay away from this one, but here goes.


Government buildings are people's places of work, and places where people come to do necessary business. Recent legislation has dictated that no-one should be obliged to work amidst cigarette smoke. Clearly, people's homes are another thing altogether.


On a related but incidental note, I believe you can no longer smoke in your own home if you employ people to work there. But there was quite a funny Alex cartoon on the topic.

I think a no smoking clause will creep into council tenancy agreements over the next few years. It will be guised in a 'damage to property' rather than public health stance though the real aim will be the latter. It will of course be impossible to police and everyone will keep doing it anyway.


It's true what Rico said about no one believing that a smoking ban in pubs would ever happen. I can remember writing an essay at school on this and we all decided that it would never ever happen in our lifetime! I also remember being stuck at the back of the plane with my smoking parents and am very glad that that came to an end.

Here's another: private back gardens. USA has seen litigation where neighbours complained. And several cities have banned smoking in public spaces/beaches.


I really do smoke. But I'm well aware how annoying (not to mention unhealthy) it can be for innocent folks in the path of my smoke. My garden is so close to others it must be annoying sometimes.


I really should quit. Maybe if I couldn't afford it and my only option for cheap housing banned it (or tested my income and realised I spent more a week on ciggies than what I claimed I could afford for rent) I would quit more quickly.


Ummm...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • we actually need growth. It may be counter intuitive, but we need investment.   my example is about poor financial management, be it personal or central. I'm referring to poor government financial management.
    • This is to conflate household budgets with government budgets. They are very different things  a large part of the anger felt across the country is the decline in public services after a decade and a half of austerity.  You cut more you get more ugly anger  Of course people need to be persuaded to pay more - but that is only realistic path. You cut more you will find out the hard way 
    • The question marks are far poore
    • I think one could argue that degrading public services / infrastructure is what's led to our current, slow economic decline. We've spent 14 years trying austerity, and it's proven counter productive to growth and productivity. A successful economy and society needs good transport, education and early intervention health care. On taxes, it depends how you target them. Tax funded spending may be a positive fiscal multiplier. Taxes on work aren't great, or when they hit the poorest (who tend to spend most of what they earn, boosting economic activity). We need a well designed wealth tax (on idle assets), and stronger measures to target avoidance. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...