Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all,


I am looking for a professional TV screen writer to collaborate on writing a TV pilot. They need to be willing to push boundaries.


The main character is a very strong female working class criminal lawyer and there will be some violence, lots of sex, subtle comedy, drama, law, crime and a bit of grit.


It's not meant to be particularly dark, just realistic and a celebration/examination of one woman's breach of various barriers/social norms whilst working in a very conservative profession.


If anyone thinks this might be something they would be interested in, pls PM me on here.


Thanks

If this happens, think about the "lots of sex". Too many shows (HBO I'm looking at you) have so much sex seemingly just because they can, and it gets to the point you just want to fast forward.


Game of thrones, Rome, The Sopranos, The Wire, Big Love, Mad Men. All guilty.


I'm no prude, but I'd rather be watching a scene that actually contributes to the story in some way..

Have you a production company interested in the concept ? If not forget it, they get hit with hundreds of "I've got the greatest idea ever" scripts per day- "Professional" (they are all freelance) script writers often have hard work getting something off the ground-sorry but that's the truth.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agree with Ots. An undercurrent of sexual tension

> works better. But if LadyD has been getting

> knobbed left, right, and centre, then I guess she

> has to be true to her story... :)


Lol. What makes you think the main character is based in me? I do immigration law.


I've got a friend with a small production company and there are more ways to fund and promote this kind of project than mainstream avenues nowadays. Once a pilot is made, selling it to a mainstream media/production company is going to be much easier.


I also know a lot of aspiring actors who would be willing to do domething like this as a way of getting a possible foot in the door.

I write for a living, but it's all legal arguments so I doubt I'd manage to write a script without any input from someone who has done this successfully before and yes, I'd want a contract drawn up with anyone involved. I will definitely want to protect against plagiarism.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the character is someone for whom sex is an

> important part of who they are, then it needs to

> be included in the writing. Not necessarily

> graphic or titillating, but part of the story.



Absolutely it should be included, I'm just saying that a lot of shows these days just seem to get a pair of tits on the screen at every given opportunity.


There's no need for it. It's not like when I was a teen watching films for a glimpse if boob or pube. These days it's not exactly hard to find if you want it.


Agree with RD, sexual undercurrent would be better than every other scene being in the bedroom.

Hmm seems to me this is a tough ask... Working class criminal Lawyer (in London?) Female lead!


Could be really interesting to explore this though but it would be very tough to steer clear of the main cliches and stereotypes - Old boy network, glass ceiling, difficult love life in a fast paced city etc


Difficult to write it without it turning into a much grittier version of Ally McBeal!

Andybol Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmm seems to me this is a tough ask... Working

> class criminal Lawyer (in London?) Female lead!


That's how Silk started and somebody bought that, so it's clearly not impossible. Not sure if more grit and grumble would help but, as Otta point out, it seems to sell remarkably well. As does anything written in Swedish and filmed in the dark, which suggests one way of sparing Otta's blushes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...