Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all


Just to follow up on our post the other day...


We'll be meeting local people and giving out the paper at the following railway stations over the next two weeks:


Queen's Road Peckham - Thursday 30th January - 8.30am

Peckham Rye - Friday 31st January - 8.30am

Nunhead - Thursday 6th February - 8.30am

Denmark Hill - Friday 7th February - 8.30am


We'll be giving out around 100 copies each time so we'll be there for as long as they last!


Please do have a look at the paper online if you have any spare time over the weekend - we've got some key stories on the proposed redevelopment of the area surrounding Peckham Rye station, an interview with a homeless person based in and around Nunhead and an interesting piece on Southwark Habitat for Humanity. In fact, several people have already contacted the charity to enquire about volunteering after reading our story, which is great news.


Link here:


http://issuu.com/peckhampeculiar/docs/the_peckham_peculiar_issue_1


Many thanks


Mark and all at The Peckham Peculiar

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bloody change eh? "Same as when all the

> immigrants come over here ruining the

> neighbourhood" etc etc etc Bit like a Monty Python

> sketch on here, keeps me amused on a Friday tho



I'd rather have a load of immigrants move in than a load of upper middle class (for want of a better term) people to be honest.

Oh absolutely, and I'm not above a bit of stereotyping.


But then I don't pre judge "immigrants" because they're different to me, and I have no problem with them and largely welcome them. There are certain groups of immigrants that I prefer to others because they just seem nicer.


And I've no problem with upper middle class people because they have more money than me or anything like that. I've just met enough that I thought were horrible to colour my opinion a bit.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think you misunderstand me sophie_d. I wish

> markmc71 and all the co-founders/contributors to

> this paper the very best, it surely will be a

> positive step for print media and the local area....


Hahahaha! And what you actually said was:


"More arty trendy middle class stuff detached from reality. So much is happening in Peckham? Maybe if you're on the cool carriage first class from Shoreditch or Dalston, but what about the real Peckham?


Louisa."



Is the only acceptable reality a working class one? Is there not room for several different realities co-habiting? Please define the 'real Peckham' for me. Is it Del boys, Desmonds or Damilola's or could it also embrace a scotch egg at the Victoria Inn?


I've lived in this area for 17 years, so have seen plenty of changes - many, but not all, positive. I'd be interested to hear if you have witnessed any positive changes at all. Reading through your posts there seems to be an obsession with maintaining a particular incarnation of Peckham. What is this and when was it? I could be wrong, but it would appear that it's quite a narrow definition of what a 'real' place could be, but perhaps you could enlighten me further to explain what you mean.

toffeese15 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Is the only acceptable reality a working class

> one? Is there not room for several different

> realities co-habiting?



Ideally, yes. But the problem is that when the *"middle classes/Gentrifiers" come, prices rise, and the other realities move on because they can't afford the area anymore, and they feel less and less like they belong / are welcome.



* Middle class is such a lazy term, and I strongly believe that working class / middle class doesn't fit today's world, but it was a quick way of saying what I meant.

Anyway, back to the important issue at hand - a view on the proposed development for the station and a reminder that if people - including you Louisa, don't like it then SAY SOMETHING!!!!!! http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-michael-petry/peckham-in-peril_b_4643580.html

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> toffeese15 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > Is the only acceptable reality a working

> class

> > one? Is there not room for several different

> > realities co-habiting?

>

>

> Ideally, yes. But the problem is that when the

> *"middle classes/Gentrifiers" come, prices rise,

> and the other realities move on because they can't

> afford the area anymore, and they feel less and

> less like they belong / are welcome.

>

>

> * Middle class is such a lazy term, and I strongly

> believe that working class / middle class doesn't

> fit today's world, but it was a quick way of

> saying what I meant.


i agree with what you're saying, i would just add how odd it is how people are so terrified of using the "c" word when it explains such a huge deal of what's going on... it really isn't as lazy a term as you are saying I don't think!!

> You might be interested in the results of a paper

> by Emma Jackson at the Department of Geography,

> King's College London.

>

> Its all about comparing the 'gentrification' of

> Peckham with another broadly similar area -

> Brixton. Turns out we're a little bit

> different...

>

> Paper: Gentrification and its other: moving beyond

> social tectonics

> Emma Jackson & Tim Butler

>

> Here she is interviewed:

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01ljk4r


this is very much worth listening to, and I really like both Emma Jackson's and Michaela Benson's work on the middle-class influx to Peckham, but I wouldn't say that this is academic certification that Peckham blow-ins are "doing it right". But still, have a listen a judge for yourselves!

JoeChuff Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > toffeese15 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > > Is the only acceptable reality a working

> > class

> > > one? Is there not room for several different

> > > realities co-habiting?

> >

> >

> > Ideally, yes. But the problem is that when the

> > *"middle classes/Gentrifiers" come, prices

> rise,

> > and the other realities move on because they

> can't

> > afford the area anymore, and they feel less and

> > less like they belong / are welcome.

> >

> >

> > * Middle class is such a lazy term, and I

> strongly

> > believe that working class / middle class

> doesn't

> > fit today's world, but it was a quick way of

> > saying what I meant.

>

> i agree with what you're saying, i would just add

> how odd it is how people are so terrified of using

> the "c" word when it explains such a huge deal of

> what's going on... it really isn't as lazy a term

> as you are saying I don't think!!



I just mean that "working class" and "middle class" doesn't define the majority of people well anymore. I honestly don't know what working class is anymore, and if I'm middle class, which I am by some definition, why are my circumstances so different to other middle class people?


It's like having boxing where everyone has to be either heavyweight or lightweight.

it's a bit more complex than it used to be, but it's still a real thing... remember that class isn't just about how you define yourself, it's about (more about, really) how others define you


the muddying of the waters you refer to is real, but it doesn't do away with the existence of class advantage - I just feel like by giving up on any idea of understanding society through the concept of class, we give up on being able to highlight and interrogate the exercise of that advantage

  • 7 months later...

Why oh Why oh Why do the hipster lebensraum vermin always seem to think that shakespeare done in an urban style in a brutalist environmen is the way to bring performance art to the masses and get them local onboard? Paternalistic sneering filth.

(http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/features/multistorey-story-shakespeare-in-the-peckham-car-park-9685677.html)


More names for the peckham rye head shot public festival. detials to follow.soon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...