Jump to content

peckham on the bbc


sophie_d

Recommended Posts

Hi all


Just to follow up on our post the other day...


We'll be meeting local people and giving out the paper at the following railway stations over the next two weeks:


Queen's Road Peckham - Thursday 30th January - 8.30am

Peckham Rye - Friday 31st January - 8.30am

Nunhead - Thursday 6th February - 8.30am

Denmark Hill - Friday 7th February - 8.30am


We'll be giving out around 100 copies each time so we'll be there for as long as they last!


Please do have a look at the paper online if you have any spare time over the weekend - we've got some key stories on the proposed redevelopment of the area surrounding Peckham Rye station, an interview with a homeless person based in and around Nunhead and an interesting piece on Southwark Habitat for Humanity. In fact, several people have already contacted the charity to enquire about volunteering after reading our story, which is great news.


Link here:


http://issuu.com/peckhampeculiar/docs/the_peckham_peculiar_issue_1


Many thanks


Mark and all at The Peckham Peculiar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bloody change eh? "Same as when all the

> immigrants come over here ruining the

> neighbourhood" etc etc etc Bit like a Monty Python

> sketch on here, keeps me amused on a Friday tho



I'd rather have a load of immigrants move in than a load of upper middle class (for want of a better term) people to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh absolutely, and I'm not above a bit of stereotyping.


But then I don't pre judge "immigrants" because they're different to me, and I have no problem with them and largely welcome them. There are certain groups of immigrants that I prefer to others because they just seem nicer.


And I've no problem with upper middle class people because they have more money than me or anything like that. I've just met enough that I thought were horrible to colour my opinion a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think you misunderstand me sophie_d. I wish

> markmc71 and all the co-founders/contributors to

> this paper the very best, it surely will be a

> positive step for print media and the local area....


Hahahaha! And what you actually said was:


"More arty trendy middle class stuff detached from reality. So much is happening in Peckham? Maybe if you're on the cool carriage first class from Shoreditch or Dalston, but what about the real Peckham?


Louisa."



Is the only acceptable reality a working class one? Is there not room for several different realities co-habiting? Please define the 'real Peckham' for me. Is it Del boys, Desmonds or Damilola's or could it also embrace a scotch egg at the Victoria Inn?


I've lived in this area for 17 years, so have seen plenty of changes - many, but not all, positive. I'd be interested to hear if you have witnessed any positive changes at all. Reading through your posts there seems to be an obsession with maintaining a particular incarnation of Peckham. What is this and when was it? I could be wrong, but it would appear that it's quite a narrow definition of what a 'real' place could be, but perhaps you could enlighten me further to explain what you mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

toffeese15 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Is the only acceptable reality a working class

> one? Is there not room for several different

> realities co-habiting?



Ideally, yes. But the problem is that when the *"middle classes/Gentrifiers" come, prices rise, and the other realities move on because they can't afford the area anymore, and they feel less and less like they belong / are welcome.



* Middle class is such a lazy term, and I strongly believe that working class / middle class doesn't fit today's world, but it was a quick way of saying what I meant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> toffeese15 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > Is the only acceptable reality a working

> class

> > one? Is there not room for several different

> > realities co-habiting?

>

>

> Ideally, yes. But the problem is that when the

> *"middle classes/Gentrifiers" come, prices rise,

> and the other realities move on because they can't

> afford the area anymore, and they feel less and

> less like they belong / are welcome.

>

>

> * Middle class is such a lazy term, and I strongly

> believe that working class / middle class doesn't

> fit today's world, but it was a quick way of

> saying what I meant.


i agree with what you're saying, i would just add how odd it is how people are so terrified of using the "c" word when it explains such a huge deal of what's going on... it really isn't as lazy a term as you are saying I don't think!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> You might be interested in the results of a paper

> by Emma Jackson at the Department of Geography,

> King's College London.

>

> Its all about comparing the 'gentrification' of

> Peckham with another broadly similar area -

> Brixton. Turns out we're a little bit

> different...

>

> Paper: Gentrification and its other: moving beyond

> social tectonics

> Emma Jackson & Tim Butler

>

> Here she is interviewed:

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01ljk4r


this is very much worth listening to, and I really like both Emma Jackson's and Michaela Benson's work on the middle-class influx to Peckham, but I wouldn't say that this is academic certification that Peckham blow-ins are "doing it right". But still, have a listen a judge for yourselves!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JoeChuff Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > toffeese15 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > > Is the only acceptable reality a working

> > class

> > > one? Is there not room for several different

> > > realities co-habiting?

> >

> >

> > Ideally, yes. But the problem is that when the

> > *"middle classes/Gentrifiers" come, prices

> rise,

> > and the other realities move on because they

> can't

> > afford the area anymore, and they feel less and

> > less like they belong / are welcome.

> >

> >

> > * Middle class is such a lazy term, and I

> strongly

> > believe that working class / middle class

> doesn't

> > fit today's world, but it was a quick way of

> > saying what I meant.

>

> i agree with what you're saying, i would just add

> how odd it is how people are so terrified of using

> the "c" word when it explains such a huge deal of

> what's going on... it really isn't as lazy a term

> as you are saying I don't think!!



I just mean that "working class" and "middle class" doesn't define the majority of people well anymore. I honestly don't know what working class is anymore, and if I'm middle class, which I am by some definition, why are my circumstances so different to other middle class people?


It's like having boxing where everyone has to be either heavyweight or lightweight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's a bit more complex than it used to be, but it's still a real thing... remember that class isn't just about how you define yourself, it's about (more about, really) how others define you


the muddying of the waters you refer to is real, but it doesn't do away with the existence of class advantage - I just feel like by giving up on any idea of understanding society through the concept of class, we give up on being able to highlight and interrogate the exercise of that advantage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Why oh Why oh Why do the hipster lebensraum vermin always seem to think that shakespeare done in an urban style in a brutalist environmen is the way to bring performance art to the masses and get them local onboard? Paternalistic sneering filth.

(http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/features/multistorey-story-shakespeare-in-the-peckham-car-park-9685677.html)


More names for the peckham rye head shot public festival. detials to follow.soon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...