Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That's a fine sentiment and one I largely agree with.


However, there is a big difference between being grateful you don't have mental health issues and you aren't addicted to drugs (we should all be grateful for that if that's the case) and saying you are lucky you are white and middle class and therefore are less likely to behave like the people being discussed on this thread some who may be suffering from various afflictions and others who are con artists.


It was Eberg who said that not you but you took up the point.

Not really


http://healthland.time.com/2011/11/07/study-whites-more-likely-to-abuse-drugs-than-blacks/


The perception that being white in anyway provides some sort of protection against the ailments described above is misguided. Race has nothing to do with it.

Well said, charlesfare. And this thread really doesn't need to turn into an argument over race. People of all races and end up very desperate, very ill and very alone, and all of equally deserving of our care and compassion. We are all VERY lucky not to be in that state.


"I have run in to her, several times over the course of several years. I never once said you should give her money, I never have because it's clear that she's someone with a lot of mental health issues and possibly a drug addiction.


I'm just saying that a) she's clearly someone who is in a really awful and desperate situation b) that there's a difference between being someone that's clearly in desperate need of the kind of help that goes far beyond just money and a greedy con artist and c) we should count ourselves fortunate that we're not in her shoes."

Before anyone else jumps in, please read the thread. The person I was originally responding- egber- brought race in to it not me. I was saying that bringing race into it was inappropriate and misguided as well as condescending.


So it seems we all agree about that now...

Whilst mental health issues and addiction do not descrminate accross class or any other boundaries, what can be said is that resources for help and support will depend on where you are on those scales. As anyone who has had to depend on NHS funded services will know, mental health resources are woefully underfunded and as a result a lot of people at the bottom of the socio-economic pile will never get anything like the level of treatment and support they really need. That is I think what charles was really saying about his luck of birth.

Pokertime who would possibly disagree with that. I have already confirmed I agree with that sentiment entirely. What I disagreed with was:


1. Egberg's comment on race which has nothing to do with any of this and should never have been made

2. The characterization of the various people on this thread as being pitiable and purely victims of circumstance. While some of the individuals described may or may not be mentally ill, the scam described by the OP is not the reserve of those suffering from mental health issues! Some are simply con artists and con artists are a type sociopath (rich or poor).

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Without-Conscience-Disturbing-World-Psychopaths/dp/1572304510


People that beg or even steal are very different to con artsits who have a very specific personality disorder that allows them to manipulate people in a very personal manner.


Again, below is the quote I took exception to that Charles initially was trying to defend...


I'm glad that I don't feel that I have to survive

> by lying, but like a few others Sue I benefit from

> an event of pure luck.

> I'm a white, middle class man born into an

> educated white middle class family. Things are

> stacked in my favour. I'm very lucky indeed.



I still think bringing race and class into a thread largely about con artists suggests a warped view of the working class / non white population.

I dunno, knocking on doors and begging for money is hardly Ocean's 11 or Enron is it? I'm not attempting to absolve anyone of anything or make excuses for other people. I'd say that understanding the aspects of society (like race and class) that lead to people do the things mentioned in this thread goes a long way towards to preventing it. It's a bit of a limited outlook to play it all down to being a sociopath. Guess we'll just have to agree to disagree!

I understand what you are trying to say LM but I have to agree with Charles. There's a world of difference between someone running a multi million ponzi sheme and someone so deperately poor (for whatever reason) reduced to begging (in whatever form). There's tons of data to support the extra stresses placed on the disadvataged, and other ethnic groups are disporportiantely represented across the socio-economic spectrum as you know. The reasons for that are complex of course but it's perfectly fine to point that out.


Charles was simply comenting on comfort. Privilege does mean a less likelihood of many things, just as disadvatage doesn't always mean more likelihood for many who are disadvantaged.


Debates on this sort of thing are always relative anyway. I remember that great sketch between Bird and Fortune about one having no money and the other thinking that meant he was down to his last million. Many people just aren't able to comprehend what having no money really means anymore. What it feels like to not eat properly (and the physiological and mental damage that does) and to not eat at all for a few days at a time. What it feels like to no be able to put gas in the meter (and therefore have no hot water)etc. We can't know what drives people to beg for pennies. Sure some of them will be con artists, but others won't.

"money for the meter" scammers are easily dealt with. If it is between 6pm and 6am their electricty meter will not go off -the vast majoirty have "non disconnect" periods at night.


If you are genuinely worried offer to help them phone their energy company for a "wind on" rather than giving them the cash.


I last had a electricity meter scammer when i lived in Camberwell, the story was her husband was out and she needed ?10 for the meter as her son was on a dialysis machine. As we were very near to Kings College hospital i offered to go with her to the hospital where they could help her son. Unsurprisingly this was declined.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
    • Thanks for that. Maybe forthcoming elections have stymied the 7 day request? If Labour get back in, do we think GALA will try with greater success in 2027?
    • Better late than never, same obscure reason as previously for not going ahead with the extended plan... "Due to commercial reasons, the event organisers have withdrawn their application to hold a 7- day event over two weekends. The application has been revised to request the use of Peckham Rye Park to hold a 4-day event over one bank holiday weekend with the following schedule: • Onsite: Monday 11 May 2026 • GALA: Friday 22 – Sunday 24 May • On the Rye Festival: BH Monday 25 May • Off-site Sunday 31 May 2026 This is the same event programme that was delivered in 2025."  GALA 2026 consultation findings report 1519.pdf
    • Do great pizzas there at community cafe.. lots going on — was free parking but plans  to like everywhere get folk to pay.  Nice area… only discovered it a few years ago..   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...