Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there, My husband and I are thinking of moving to Dulwich/ East Dulwich/ Hearne Hill. I am pregnant so at some point we will need to think about schools. We thought it would be best to move into a catchment area of a good state school. Have heard that Dulwich Infants and Hamlet are great (and have outstanding ofsted reports). The catchments seems to be tiny though and the houses in the catchments very expensive. We are worried about paying over the odds for a house near the schools but still not getting in due to changing catchments etc. Does anyone have an opinion on which direction would be best to go to have good back up options (e.g.

- if went to Danecroft Road area we could maybe get into Jessop if don't get into the village schools.

- if went to Croxsted Road area we could maybe get into Rosendale if don't get into the village schools.

(Both have outstanding reports from Ofsted).


Do you think those would be a better options than going Beauval road direction where if we miss the village schools it looks like we would be aiming for Heber, which has a "needs improvement" rating.


It is our first child so we are very new to all this (and can't believe we are having to think of school catchments etc already but everyone keeps telling us we need to take it into account for our move). Not sure how much reliance to place on ofsted reports either.


Any advice would be much appreciated!!


Thank you

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/40858-house-move-and-catchment-areas/
Share on other sites

Also bear in mind that you may move but the headmaster of the school may change and standards may drop, similarly often the schools that need improvement gets lots of funding and attention and can often improve dramatically over a 3-4yr period.


Therefore I would say schools can change so don't invest too much into it!

Headmistress. And they tend to be long-stayers, or homegrown at DVI & Hamlet. And they are just lovely schools - I speak with some 14 years continuous experience of both under my belt now.


You could do worse than look at the houses in the small enclave opposite ED hospital. We are little known of, but in the catchment for both DVI & DHJS, slightly cheaper than more popular ED/HH/DV roads, and a lot bigger square footage too. Our gardens are small but we the added benefit of being 10 mins from Lordship lane shops one way and 10 mins from Dulwich Village the other. To my mind this is the best place to live in SE London. I can't believe others haven't cottoned on to it! :D


P.S. I'm prepared to be disagreed with ;)

I agree with you Sillywoman! it is a brilliant location!

But?.you are unlikely to get into DVI or Hamlet from here based on recent years, or certainly, if you did, it would be last offer on the waiting list and by no means a certainty. You were one step ahead when you moved here years ago!

canela Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> also bear in mind (as you can see from searching

> threads on the forum) that there a lot of parents

> with children at Heber who are very happy with the

> school. Ofsted is not everything.


I'll second this. Despite the 'myth' of choice these days, I looked around a lot of schools because we weren't sure where we were going to be living and put them on the list based on where I thought my son would 'fit' best and be happiest - this was not the one with the 'best' OFSTED report. Hard, of course, to add this into the equation before they're born...

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks very much to you all for replying. I really appreciate the advice. We are now thinking maybe North Dulwich/Hearne Hill or the streets between Dulwich Village and Lordship Lane if the right thing comes up there. It is a big decision and a lot to think about. School-wise I am beginning to think it is a little early to make the decision based mainly on that. Either of these areas seem ok for schools so I think we will now look for a house we like there and re-assess the school decision later on.


Thanks very much

Bear in mind that catchments areas will probably continue to shrink year on year, so being equidistant between two schools but on the doorstep of none may not be a smart tactic and could leave you in a so-called 'black hole'. Better to be very close to one school and had a 'dead cert' with options to try for others.


Somewhere on this forum is a map showing the overlapping circles of catchments for all the schools.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would you like to rephrase this?  Your wording gives the impression that TfL is trying to expel its own employees from the country. TfL has changed nothing. The government visa rules have changed and this affects some  TfL staff and their right to work in the UK.  As far as I am aware, TfL and the Mayor are working with the unions to try and keep those affected in their jobs.
    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...