Jump to content

Recommended Posts

James I think you actually have more of a problem with the levels of comparison of levels of abuse being aimed at black people as opposed to abuse being aimed at gay people,and the (in your eyes) acceptability of abuse of one over the other than the actual abuse itself, give it a rest for crying out loud! You are going on a bit.


You have made it more "well abuse at me is worse than abuse at you" kind of thing your statement says it all,


Oh and by the way, pk and Citizen - Muffintop said that she overheard a man saying to his friend "She's pretty for a black girl." I have been followed by a gang of kids shouting "F*cking batty man" in a menacing way at me. Which do you think is more severe?


Its not a competition James, and no, that is not the only bad thing that has ever been said to me, just the morning in question, now put a blooming sock in it, its getting very bbooooooooooorrrrrring now

Muffintop, how you can fail to understand my point is beyond me. My point is that while racism is still a problem it is generally more subtle and covert, whereas we are still at the overt stage with homophobia.


This is evidenced by the fact that there is still homophobia within the media (e.g. use of the word "gay" to mean rubbish, tabloids screaming about gays etc) and the unfair court ruling whereby a registrar was allowed to discriminate against gays, plus the lack of reporting of gay attacks and unchallenged homophobia in schools.


When did I say "abuse at me is worse than abuse at you because you're black"? This is not what I said at all. You are being very disingenous twisting my words like this. How many more times do I have to repeat myself? Read my post again.


I think the people who are deliberately, repeatedly twisting my words because they don't want to face what I'm saying are boring, to be honest.


We are further along in the fight against racism, which is something to be proud of (although we must stay vigilant too). But now we must use the lessons learned to tackle homophobia - zero tolerance.

When did I say "abuse at me is worse than abuse at you because you're black"? This is not what I said at all. You are being very disingenous twisting my words like this. How many more times do I have to repeat myself? Read my post again.


Ok, I immediately deleted the "because you're black" reference as soon as I posted it, it was inflaming and I get a little hot headed at times, conceded and apologies. (check the posted at 10.35 edited at 10.36)


Racial abuse, "subtle", I think not, look at society.

You're doing a fair amount of evading yourself, James.


Your original post was specifically about the use of the word 'gay' meaning something a bit rubbish.


Despite me pointing out a few times now that "you" (gay people) use the word in what many people could be forgiven for thinking was exactly the same way - to each other - and to straight people all the time, you've steadfastly and conveniently chosen to ignore this and instead go off on one about a hundred unconnected other things.

Likewise, sorry if I am being a bit hot-headed. The last thing I would do is belittle victims of racism or brush aside this country's shameful colonial legacy.


As I said before, I have black friends who have told me about the subtle but pervasive discrimination they face, and it's not right.


But I am making a different point about homophobia.

The point about the word gay is very simple, Bob.


What other word to describe a minority group is also deemed acceptable to mean "sh*t"?


I happily use the word to describe myself and others and don't mind other people calling me gay - it's what I am after all!

I wonder if some people are missing James' above point that there are many people who feel it is OK to continue to be homophobic, while expressing racist beliefs has widely become socially unacceptable.


It doesn't seem to be arguing that racism doesn't continue to be pervasive and is affecting many in our society.


I find the argument that people should tone down their image at Pride, as it may add fuel to the bigots' argument, just a little bit offensive. To me that's the wrong way round. As far as I am concerned, Pride is about being open and expressing gayness in all its varied and colourful ways, it is about diversity and a celebration of all expressions of being gay. It is not about showing others that we are normal and just like them. And part of that is our sexual identity. Pride has largely turned into one big party, but I still think it has an important role in bringing together so many in our community.


One last point, there is still little support for young gay people. Many feel forced to stay quiet about their sexuality and unable to talk to their peers, teachers and importantly their parents to talk about something that is perfectly 'normal'. And for that reason alone, it's important that we bang on about it again and again.

I find the argument that people should tone down their image at Pride, as it may add fuel to the bigots' argument, just a little bit offensive. To me that's the wrong way round. As far as I am concerned, Pride is about being open and expressing gayness in all its varied and colourful ways, it is about diversity and a celebration of all expressions of being gay. It is not about showing others that we are normal and just like them. And part of that is our sexual identity. Pride has largely turned into one big party, but I still think it has an important role in bringing together so many in our community.


I'm sorry if you were offended but you really don't seem to understand what causes homophobia in the first place.

Dulwich_ Park_ Fairy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I'm sorry if you were offended but you really

> don't seem to understand what causes homophobia in

> the first place.



Thank you for patronising me. I suppose it's not enough to have been on the end of it, obviously the causes of homophobia are beyond me. Cheers.

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I think the people who are deliberately,

> repeatedly twisting my words because they don't

> want to face what I'm saying are boring, to be

> honest.


James, to be fair, having followed this thread closely you seem to be doing more word-twisting than anyone else. You've (whether deliberately or not) misconstrued a lot of arguments and taken them to be direct attacks. Read them again with a calm, rational head on and you may find you've been overly defensive when in essence pretty much everyone is agreeing with you.

Thank you for patronising me. I suppose it's not enough to have been on the end of it, obviously the causes of homophobia are beyond me. Cheers.


Look, I'm being serious, why do you think most people are homophobic? What can be done to change this?

DPF, I may be misunderstanding some of your words, but are you arguing that some gays bring homophobia on themselves?


Nope not at all. My initial point was that some of the outlandishness at Pride does little to increase acceptance among those have pre-existing prejudices and don't come into contact with members of the gay community on a regular basis.

>>My initial point was that some of the outlandishness at Pride does little to increase acceptance among those have pre-existing prejudices and don't come into contact with members of the gay community on a regular basis.


This reminds me of the people who said of the racist murder of Stephen Lawrence "Well you know, he was no angel himself."

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I assume that everyone who's happy to throw the

> word "gay" around as an insult would do the same

> with the word "n*gger"?

>

> After all, some black people use that word

> ironically as a term of address to each other.


That's a really poor argument.


The percentage of the black population who actually use the word "n*gger" is 'hardly any of them'.

The percentage of the gay population who use the word 'gay' is the way we're talking about is 'most of them, from time to time'.*


*When it suits them.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd like to take this opportunity to ask everyone

> to calm down and stop being so gay.



That made me crease up! >:D<


Gay was a word which had a meaning along the lines of meaning, happy, happy go lucky, jolly etc. this was then hijacked by us (being gay myself) to describe people who were of homosexual, lesbian or bi-sexual orientation, it was never a derogatory term. The word "nigger" has always been an insulting and derogatory term for a black person. (oh, being of mixed race myself too!)


although even the word "jolly" at some point got hijacked as another word for a condom!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
    • Nothing to do with the topic of this thread, but I have to say, I think it is quite untrue that people don't make human contact in cities. Just locally, there are street parties, road WhatsApp groups, one street I know near here hires a coach and everyone in the street goes to the seaside every year! There are lots of neighbourhood groups on Facebook, where people look out for each other and help each other. In my experience people chat to strangers on public transport, in shops, waiting in queues etc. To the best of my knowledge the forum does not need donations to keep it going. It contains paid ads, which hopefully helps Joe,  the very excellent admin,  to keep it up and running. And as for a house being broken into, that could happen anywhere. I knew a village in Devon where a whole row of houses was burgled one night in the eighties. Sorry to continue the off topic conversation when the poor OP was just trying to find out who was open for lunch on Christmas Day!
    • We went to Chern Thai for lunch on Saturday, as we have done quite often, and they were closed, with no sign of life. The sign in the window still says Saturday 12-3, and there was no indication that they would be closed. Can anybody shed any light? We went to Chilli and Garlic on Zenoria Street instead. Their falafel salad bowl is amazing (and amazing value!) but we had been looking forward to a Pad Thai and a pint of Singha! ETA: I am reviving this thread because it is/was  specifically about Chern Thai's opening times! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...