Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


My husband and I are thinking of buying a new desktop and my husband says we should go for iMac.

I know it is better looking, almost virus-free, better for photo or video editing. But is it really worth the extra money we need to pay?


I've seen the newest Windows PC models and many of them have touch screens which I love.


If you have used both, would greatly appreciate any advice!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/42034-mac-vs-windows-pc/
Share on other sites

Depends on what you want to use it for. For everyday stuff there's not much difference. For high end graphic design, video editing etc, it's mac all the way. But whatever you go for, get the highest spec motherboard and processor you can afford. Everything else can be ugraded as you go along.

IMac every time. Well worth it. They're very reliable.


My parents used to have a Windows system and every month I'd get a phone call about some malware or other. Then they'd install Norton or some other useless equivalent that would grind the system to a halt. More phone calls. I virtually ordered them to get a Mac and after much grumbling about the price they got one. No phone calls since.


Nothing wrong with a well built PC paired with Linux if you know how to use it, but Windows is utter junk in my opinion.

healey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > healey Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > but Windows is utter junk in my opinion.

> >

> > I know Windows, Mac and Linux OS's very well, so I have to ask... why?

>

> The registry.


And the eternally boring plist vs registry fanboi argument is relevant to your standard user how exactly?


Personally, I think anyone that recommends Windows/Mac/Linux over whatever other without understanding the needs of the user is not worth listening to. Each has their advantages. Each their disadvantages.

I have both - I find the reliability/stability about the same. I also find the PC slightly more user friendly.


As for the 'mac is better for graphics/video' reputation, it's of course subjective and down to what software you prefer. If there's a specific piece of mac-only software that you have your heart set on then fine, but I doubt that's the case.

> And the eternally boring plist vs registry fanboi

> argument is relevant to your standard user how

> exactly?

>

> Personally, I think anyone that recommends

> Windows/Mac/Linux over whatever other without

> understanding the needs of the user is not worth

> listening to....


It's my opinion. I'm entitled to one without being insulted. Is that okay with you? You asked a question and I gave you answer. If you don't like it that's your problem, not mine.

Just been looking into this before buying a new laptop. I used to use a Mac for work, which at the time was chosen because I needed to run Final Cut Studio and the options for video editing PC just weren't as good, or required extra hardware. Don't think this is the case at all now, you can get the same specs as a Mac in a PC machine half the price, and the Adobe software (e.g. Premiere) is as good if not better than Final Cut now anyway. So I got a well specced HP laptop, and it's been great, no problem with video editing or graphics work, or gaming. And that's just a laptop.


That said, Windows 8, which it came with, is a bit of a mess. It seems to want you to use it in a sort of tablet mode, and comes with a few bits of nonsense software. Plus all the Windows 8 app versions of desktop software such as skype or dropbox are really terrible. But if you use it in desktop mode and get desktop versions of the software, you can largely ignore all of that and it works fine. No idea about Windows 7, may be better.


In desktop mode, then, not sure I'd have much to choose between the Mac/Window's OSes. I didn't find the Mac one that intuitive to use, as some people claim, but it did seem pretty stable all round. I also used Windows vista for years, which everyone seems to enjoy hating on, but also found that very stable and easy to use. So unless you want to use a mac specific piece of software, I would go PC, especially if you want to use it for games at all. Really feel with Macs that you're paying double the price for the name. Oh, and maybe the retina screen, if you're into that, but from what I've heard it can have the effect of making stuff that isn't at the right resolution a bit rubbish?

Final Cut for non compressed HD projects still runs better on a high spec mac than it does PC, and if you are running AVID it has to be mac. I run premier pro on a high spec PC but doing anything in after effects like rotoscoping, forget it. Again the Mac is the better option. But we are talking high end editing and VFX though and that's not something most people have to worry about. There's a reason why all post houses use Macs for online editing and fx.


I've found windows 7 to be fairly problem free. I had heard about some issues (dislikes) with windows 8, so have stuck with 7. Before that I was using XP for years. Vista had lots of issues, like Millenium before it. XP was based on windows 2000. Again, there's a reason why some OS's have longevity, and others fade away.


But where I do agree, is that on a day to day consumer level, a PC is as good as any Mac, and everything is always cheaper for PC.

I think that's a good summary, PokerTime. There are certain jobs for which a mac has become industry standard - in some cases the leading software is mac only, so there's no decision to be made.


But I really think the average home user is simply paying a few hundred quid to have that nice big apple logo on display.

Adobe have a great little suite Katanita, with speedgrade and audition too, it's everything you need to do smaller, offlined projects. After Effects is the only part of it that struggles imo on a PC. Too much rendering needed to do anything complicated (although, if you wanted to do a Harry Potter, you wouldn't be using After Effects anyway). I always saw Final Cut as a baby AVID, but Premier has defintely caught up.

Love_London - as I said, we really need to know what you are going to use the machine for - and what sort of budget you have. Are you looking for some sort of specific use, or just standard web browsing/email stuff? Are you currently using Windows?


Agreed that Windows 8 still in the difficult early stage at the moment (the Star Trek movie rule is holding firm), but Windows 7 is fast and stable. Windows 7 has touch screen functionality (though Win 8 is more tablet-like), but I usually find my pudgy finger isn't precise enough and I end up suing a mouse anyway.

Possibly heuristic questions:


1. What has led to your thinking of buying a new desktop?

2. What points seem particularly relevant, irrelevant or worrying to you if you look at any articles on choice between Mac/Windows/Linux?


Personal query: I've never thought of getting a touch screen, but would assume that, if they're available to buy, there will be free or cheap drivers available to enable them to run on most existing operating systems. Is that so?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...