Jump to content

Would you like to sponsor a finalist in the Miss Universe GB beauty pageant?


Recommended Posts

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Might attract less weirdos in the ED Business section


Unlikely! Maybe best to have a think about what businesses might sponsor something like this (beauty/cosmetics type stuff at a guess?) and approach them directly.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> numbers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Might attract less weirdos in the ED Business

> section

>

> Unlikely! Maybe best to have a think about what

> businesses might sponsor something like this

> (beauty/cosmetics type stuff at a guess?) and

> approach them directly.


I agree it may be better to approach such companies directly but as an ED resident who wants to make use of a local, family forum it would have been nice to think there was a part of the forum the OP could have used.


Can't imagine posting in the business section would have attracted comments from local businesses such as "show us the money shot".

With the improvement of technology,there are more and more electronic products appear in people's daily life.We have to admit that the mobile phone make our modern life better and more convenient.However the cell phone sometimes cause new problems and breaks up people's peaceful life.To create a quiet condition, buy signal jammer from http://www.jammerfromchina.comcan help a lot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...