Jump to content

Recommended Posts

scareyt Wrote:



>As it stands, it just sounds like a simple part of the description given following a suspicious encounter with a strange man in case anyone else had the same thing happen to them.


Yeah, but the stranger in question was already off on their way by the time the OP got to the door. No one's managed to go in to any real detail about what exactly is suspicious about having your door knocked on. Where's the threat in someone cycling away for your house and saying "wrong door"?


>You develop a fine-tuned instinct for behaviour that isn't right and could turn into a threat, and that's what the OP sounds like to me.


I've developed a "fine tuned instinct" for certain types of behaviour, too. Please don't imply that your experiences and knowledge are some how more valid than my own. I'd be on the same page as you in there had been some sort of confrontation or act of violence, but I know first hand that black skin causes people to see threatening or suspicious behaviour where there is none.

scareyt Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> It sounds like you have equated this thread with

> the front gardens one, and decided that somehow

> the OP was objecting to the presence of a black

> man on her doorstep in the same way that other

> people were objecting to rubbish and weeds in

> other people's front gardens, as some kind of

> undesirable rubbish spoiling their view. If this

> is genuinely what you believe then I feel great

> compassion towards you.


Cheers for the "great compassion" but nah, that isn't what happened. Believe it or not, I've got the cognitive faculties to separate two completely unrelated threads about to different topics. Read that back and ask yourself how patronising you sound.

I agree. What is inherently dodgy about someone knocking on a door and riding away before you answer the door, then explaining that it was the wrong house?


If that's not an inherently dodgy scenario, which I think is the case, what made the OP think it was?


It was night? Ok maybe, but most burglaries happen during the day and night time ones are more likely to be creepers where they don't wake the occupiers, so unlikely to knock first.


He was young? He was black? No?


What else was there?

charlesfare Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Read

> that back and ask yourself how patronising you

> sound.


Fair enough. I've now deleted most of that post. What I was trying to say is that yes it's crap that a young black man can't knock on the wrong door by mistake without being suspected of being a criminal. And it's crap that a woman can't open a door to any strange man late at night without feeling scared. Both of those things are crap.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What is inherently dodgy about someone

> knocking on a door and riding away before you

> answer the door, then explaining that it was the

> wrong house?


It's unusual. I've lived in South London for a while now, not once have I had a stranger knocking on the door in the night. Then realising it's the wrong house before anyone even answered (and the 'right' house is far enough away for him to get back on his bike)... pretty strange. Of course it could all be perfectly innocent (and probably is), but I'd at least think "what the hell was all that about?"


Just because you personally wouldn't find the situation suspicious, it's unfair to declare that it's categorically not dodgy.


From the way some people are carrying on, you'd think that the OP has already made up his mind that the kid was guilty of something. But I don't think that's the case.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
    • I always like Redemptions coffee though I've not visted for awhile..Romeo Jones was always my 1st choice for takeout Coffee Redemption 2nd. What IS with all these independent Yoga and Pilates Studios? Theres one on London Rd in Forest Hill (Mind) thats recently opened and then theres the Pilates place thats opened on North X Road. I looked at the prices of the one on NorthX road and was frankly shocked at how expensive it is, The FH one is slightly less.  Made me decide to stick with classes in The local authority gym
    • Dulwich Village update: The old DVillage location is (again?) under offer. The storefront next to the new grocer is going to open as a yoga and pilates studio...the name of which I've forgotten. 🤦‍♂️  Megan's is starting to push its takeaway coffee and cannibalise some of Redemption Coffee's market share. Is Megan's struggling? It's quite a big restaurant they have and rent cant be cheap. The reinventing of the Megan's branch on Lordship Lane as Ollie's seems to have stalled. And Redemption is looking a bit tired these days...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...