Jump to content

Recommended Posts

PokerTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> After 20 vodkas, the moer sugar the better ;)

>

> I thought the really nasty stuff in red bull was

> the taurine?


Not Really..


Taurine is found in high concentrations in muscle, brain, heart and blood.

A person weighing 70 kg has approximately 70 g of taurine distributed throughout their body.


Put another way, a 70 kg person naturally already has in his body 70 times the amount of taurine contained in one can of Red Bull Energy Drink.


Source.. http://energydrink.redbull.com/taurine


DulwichFox

I feel inspired (no sarcasm), although I still intend to enjoy the good stuff in smaller quantities and less frequently.


Here's a list of foods and their glycaemic indices: http://www.the-gi-diet.org/lowgifoods/

I'm surprised at some of the values e.g. mango versus watermelon.


PeckhamRose, this is probably obvious but have you tried gradually reducing the sugar in your tea/coffee? If you reduce it by minute amounts over a long period of time it should be imperceptible to you, even if it is as tedious as reducing by a gram per week. Whatever reduction you achieve if you can sustain it over the long term then it will be beneficial.

Water Melon..


The GI Glycemic Index is not the best way to measure affect on Blood Sugar

Better to use GL the Glycemic Load.


Watermelon (GI 72; GL 4):


This delicious summer fruit may at first look like a high-glycemic food with its glycemic index of 72,


but it actually has a very low-glycemic load.


Why? Because it's made up of a lot of water, hence the name.


Watermelon is also loaded in antioxidants with high levels of both vitamin C and vitamin A. It also contains


lycopene, which is shown to be helpful for heart health.


GI:



 

I think that's an important point, Fox. A friend recently told me that a glass of orange juice has a similar (or maybe even more) sugar than a glass of coke, however, the former has various nutritional benefits. So comparing foods using a single factor e.g sugar content or GI is not necessarily helpful.

Water Melon..


The GI Glycemic Index is not the best way to measure affect on Blood Sugar

Better to use GL the Glycemic Load.


Watermelon (GI 72; GL 4):


This delicious summer fruit may at first look like a high-glycemic food with its glycemic index of 72,


but it actually has a very low-glycemic load.


Why? Because it's made up of a lot of water, hence the name.


Watermelon is also loaded in antioxidants with high levels of both vitamin C and vitamin A. It also contains


lycopene, which is shown to be helpful for heart health.


GI:-

Low Intermediate High

55 or less 55 to 70 70 or higher


GL:-

Low Intermediate High

10 or less 11 to 19 20 or higher




Want to calculate the glycemic load of instant white rice instead? Well, a portion size of around 2/3 cup of white rice has about 36 grams of available carbohydrates and a glycemic index of 72. Here's the math:

72 x 36 = 2,592 / 100 = 26 glycemic load


So just a small amount of white rice will send your blood sugars through the roof.


People often say. 'Eat a Chinese meal and 30 mins later you hungry again'


Well that is why..


High GI/GL Chinese food will give you a fast rush of Blood Sugar followed by a rapid crash.


So you feel hungry again, so you eat more food and you put on weight. If you keep eating high GI food.

and keep snacking in between, your Pancreas cannot cope and you develop Type - 2 Diabetes.


Foxy

I gave up added sugar for Lent one year, and it was pretty hard. No cakes, biccies, chocolate etc, but also no crisps, condiments, some pasta/pizza sauces etc. There's a lot of hidden sugar. The upside was that when I did eat something sweet again it tasted almost off-puttingly so, which meant I've ended up eating fewer cakes etc since then.

Wow, you know a lot Foxy. I learned a few things.


I used to have a sweet tooth when I was younger Nigello but as I've got older I can't eat anything suger filled, so your taste buds can definitely change.


Someone earlier though mentioned getting the last teaspoon of sugar in tea or coffee to 0. I too have never managed this. Getting it down to one small spoonful was fairly easy, but beyond that there's a bitterness that I can never grow to like. I don't like lager/beer and coffee for the same reason. I taste the same bitterness in those things. Olives are a funny one though because as much as I love olive oil, I always struggled with raw olives, because I find the same bitterness with those. But I can eat filled olives.

Hi PokerTime..


I was diagnosed with Type-2 Diabetes Feb. 2011. I was Horrified at it led to serious depression.

Newly diagnosed people are offered 2 Sessions at Desmonds, a diabetic seminar at Dulwich Hospital.


There we were all told that Type-2 Diabetes was NOT reversible..


I did some research and found there were websites that claimed Type-2 Diabetes could be reversed.

But most of these were quack send me $100's and I will tell you how sites.


However further research indicated that following a VERY low carb diet for 3 months could effectively

reverse diabetes. This initially was not recommended by Diabetes UK.


It was virtually a starvation diet. and I lost a lot of weight. This did keep my blood sugar in control.


But then I injured my back and was on pain killers for 3 months that gage me Severe constipation.

I literally did not go for 10 days at a time. I could not eat as I was Full.


This involuntary starvation led to my diabetes being reversed.


My 6 monthly/yearly HBa1c (a test that gives your average reading over the last 3 months was 5.6mmol/L

and has remained at that level for the last 2.5 years.


I have been re-coded as Non-diabetic. I can/do eat most thing, but I am careful as I do not wish to

become diabetic again.


I did all this by diet alone (No medication)


Type - 2 Diabetes CAN be reversed an Diabetes UK now recognise this.


DulwichFox

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

DF: quotation delimiters and attributions always

> please, at least as a courtesy to readers and

> sources.


Not quite with you there..


Info supplied based on my own knowledge...


You can find examples here.


http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/how-to-calculate-glycemic-load.html


DF

That's an incredible story Fox. I do think there are a range of conditions that could be treated by diet if only more research were done. You mentioned depression, and I know a lot about that. And similarly have done research into a range of alternatives that can compliment or replace medication, including diet. It's like a car isn't it. If you put the right fuel in, it will run smoothly. Put in the wrong fuel or oil etc, and things start to go wrong.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Water Melon..

>

> The GI Glycemic Index is not the best way to

> measure affect on Blood Sugar

> Better to use GL the Glycemic Load.

>

> Watermelon (GI 72; GL 4):

>

> This delicious summer fruit may at first look like

> a high-glycemic food with its glycemic index of

> 72,

>

> but it actually has a very low-glycemic load.

>

> Why? Because it's made up of a lot of water, hence

> the name.

>

> Watermelon is also loaded in antioxidants with

> high levels of both vitamin C and vitamin A. It

> also contains

>

> lycopene, which is shown to be helpful for heart

> health.

>

> GI:

>

>

>


All things in moderation.


http://medias.omgif.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Watermelon-eating-contest.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...