Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Crazy idea here, completely unprecedented I know

> and couldn?t possibly work but here you go:

> Regulate the cost of private rentals and if you

> are going to have a social housing system make

> sure the councils have enough of their own housing

> stock.

>

> I know I know it sounds nuts. It was just one of

> those mad thoughts I sometimes have.



If thats how you feel, then why DONT YOU GO TO RUSSIA AND SEE HOW YOU LIKE IT...


etc

Here is an update on the case of the Council House:


EALING: Council workers sacked over ?1.2m house

8:20am Friday 10th October 2008


Three temps have been sacked over their role in a ?12,500-a-month housing scandal.

Ealing Council hit the headlines yesterday when it emerged an Afghan mother of seven was staying in an Acton mansion for free, at taxpayers expense. David Lewis, of Balham, was called into an office with the rest of his team shortly after the news broke and all three of them were fired on the spot. He said: ?We were escorted out of the building like criminals. We?ve been made scape goats for it and now we are all unemployed. I have to start looking for another job and it?s not the best time now.? The council only has to give them one week?s notice, because they are temps, but chose not to let them stay, instead paying the trio for work they will never do.


Toorpakai Saindi came to the country seven years ago and was given the ?1.2m house after reporting to the council as homeless in July. Mr Lewis claims he and his colleagues have done nothing wrong but merely followed a set of criteria laid down by the Government. He says a different council department made the decision to put the family in private rented accommodation, and the price was set by an arm of the Department for Work and Pensions. He claims another office in the council had the power to cap the amount spent on the rent but chose not to. Verity Adams, a spokesman for the council, said: ?We have taken the decision to consolidate all work with private landlords into one housing team. ?This has meant that we ended the contract of three agency staff working on a temporary basis.?

How refreshing and re-assurring to realise some things never change in this wonderful world which we are so fortunate to inhabit!

When the poo-poo hits the fan its the dear old Temps who are the natural scapegoat:-$

Restores omes faith in the system somewhat.>:D<

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...