Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Accepting PokerTime's point for the moment and answering James, I'd propose the only 2 intersections that meet what seem to be space and shape criteria:

East Dulwich Road and Peckham Rye

The South Circular and Lordship Lane

The strict confines of East Dulwich are "blessed" with no major intersection ? !

I'm not particularly convinced about the design of it. It looks like there's scope for lots of pedestrian/cycle incidents as pedestrians end up having to wait/cross three sets of traffic - a cycle lane, the main road and then the other cycle lane. Not to mention that depending on the light phasing, there are going to be a proportion of pedestrians who cross diagonally (I see them doing it at Vauxhall now amazingly given there's no 'all stop') which is going to get messy!


It would only work with its own bike light phases and you may find confident or faster cyclists staying in the main flow of traffic since it's unlikely that the bike lights will be given the same priority as cars. Double sets of lights can cause confusion though for all road users. Without its own lights, it just wouldn't work except for cyclists happy to make a simple (UK left, US right) turn. The straight on cyclists would be taken out by left/right turning cars and the turn right/left ones would have to wait at the far side for the straight on cars to stop.


The SC/LL junction won't work - the pavements on the corner are very narrow unless you took out the left filter lane for the South Circular which isn't realistically going to happen. I can't really think of anywhere locally where it might.


I think the only places where it might work spaces-wise are major junctions in town (e.g. Vauxhall/Lambeth Bridges onto Embankment) but unfortunately, they are already so busy that I can't see any extra bike light phases being particularly welcome to any users. Not to mention that the Embankment is so full of cyclists at this time of year that the congestion in those little bike lanes would be horrendous to try to get out in a limited amount of time.


It's not a million miles away from that Dutch roundabout that was doing the rounds late last year which, I have to say, scared me more than the thought of crossing Vauxhall Bridge in the morning!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Was planning to come on here to ask if anyone might know which celeb/royal came through Lordship Lane yesterday - was on my way up to Spurs, on bus at the roundabout by the EDT when some whistling police cyclists pulled the traffic to the side of the road to allow a biggish range rover to shoot past, on the way up towards Dog Kennel Hill. Could only make out two, maybe middle-aged, men in the front before it passed. Mildly hysterical lady on pavement was laughing/screeching with her friend that they were desperately trying to find out who it was. Had more reason to post after this lunchtime's experience. Had just got to bus stop opposite the M&S by the station when some mini cooper thing bombed through the traffic, swerving across to cut up another car to get up the hill, before two or three police cars followed about 20 seconds behind. Said mini cooper thing then reappeared coming the other way, beeping its horn to get other cars out the way before it bombed up what I think was Elsie Road, with police cars now on both sides of the road by Maxin trying to stop traffic getting in the way/half the speeding car. Bit more than I had bargained for when I set out/want in local area! Stay careful out there folks, this place is getting scarier...
    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...