Jump to content

Recommended Posts

OK,

As far as I know, they are relatively inefficient i.e. they have to be turned off in high winds! The foundations for the turbines are massive holes pumped full of concrete that will never be able to be removed, access roads have to be built to them, they cause problems for fledgling birds; in Scotland there have been issues with endangered birds e.g Golden Eagles being killed by the sails and there are the huge costs involved in manufacturing the turbines and the land subsidies. Not to mention the fact that they are fairly unsightly and pretty noisy if you live close by.

My mother, who lives in rural Scotland, looked into having one small turbine installed to provide power but apparently she has the 'wrong type of wind'.

I'm all for renewable energy but sometimes the options smack of jobs for the boys and lining pockets.

Harnessing wave energy would be far less impactful and much more efficient but fewer people would be able to make any money from that.

If governments in future really want to make a difference, there needs to be legislation that makes all new build houses have a solar panel, ground source heating etc etc. Oh hang on though if houses convert to ground source heating what will the gas and oil companies do then?

Asset Wrote:

OK, As far as I know, they are relatively inefficient

i.e. they have to be turned off in high winds!

.... Not to mention the fact that they are fairly

> unsightly and pretty noisy if you live close by...


Now look Asset please...I'm NOT a great Royalist,in truth,but I will NOT have this fine,noble,upstanding and dignified Family maligned in this way!!:X:X

Hmm, I think concrete foundations go into pretty much every building bigger than a shed, and even then....


Turbines don't have nearly the impact on bird populations that just about any other human activity has, if you're that concerned about our feathered friends ban cats as pets.

In fact the RSPB are pro wind farms and you'll notice the only examples of negative impact on bird populations they give aren't in the UK http://www.rspb.org.uk/ourwork/policy/windfarms/index.asp


Indeed small turbines attached to your house are little more than gestures, have you noticed how big they need to be?

Turbines are very efficient, and yes they may be intermittent, but what isn't, even coal powered stations need down time. But get this, it's totally clean and ... ooh renewable.


So they're pretty ugly (I actually think they're rather majestic but hey); world is dying and bigger sacrifices will have to be made, and made soon, than having the horizon a bit cluttered.


"I'm all for renewable energy but sometimes the options smack of jobs for the boys and lining pockets." poppy cock, fuck sight cheaper than ploughing it all into a new generation of nuclear power stations that will not only cost untold billions but will lump future generations with enormous clean up bills just as we're having to pay astronomical costs now for the first generation of stations.


Wind farms are no magic solution but they're a bloody start.

mockney piers Wrote:

So they're pretty ugly (I actually think they're

rather majestic but hey);


I'm really getting confused now.

O.K. We seem to have accepted that The Royal Family are ugly but they would be "majestic" if nothing else,schurely?

One problem which is often cited regarding wind turbines is that the level of wind is not reliable. There was another discussion on here a while back about energy storage, or a possible "global grid", which was an interesting concept.


I have to be honest, I am not so bothered about concrete foundations, access roads, or aesthetic issues - to me, these are preferable to the side effects of conventional power stations.


And I don't really buy the oil and gas conspiracy stuff, isn't the UK a net importer of oil? And in any case, it's in the interest of the energy giants to look into renewable technologies as future revenue earners, because at some point it will no longer be cost effective to drill for what little oil we have left.


Wave energy is in it's infancy, but it will be interesting to see how it pans out... especially after the embarrasment of "Salters Duck". But on it's own it won't be enough, that much is certain. We'll need to harness all the energy available to us... be it wave, tidal, wind, solar... it seems unfortunately inevitable that nuclear fission power stations are here to stay, but hopefully they can be kept to a minimum if there is a real effort to push renewable sources and reduce consumption.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmm, I think concrete foundations go into pretty

> much every building bigger than a shed, and even

> then....

>

> Turbines don't have nearly the impact on bird

> populations that just about any other human

> activity has, if you're that concerned about our

> feathered friends ban cats as pets.

> In fact the RSPB are pro wind farms and you'll

> notice the only examples of negative impact on

> bird populations they give aren't in the UK

> http://www.rspb.org.uk/ourwork/policy/windfarms/in

> dex.asp

>

> Indeed small turbines attached to your house are

> little more than gestures, have you noticed how

> big they need to be?

> Turbines are very efficient, and yes they may be

> intermittent, but what isn't, even coal powered

> stations need down time. But get this, it's

> totally clean and ... ooh renewable.

>

> So they're pretty ugly (I actually think they're

> rather majestic but hey); world is dying and

> bigger sacrifices will have to be made, and made

> soon, than having the horizon a bit cluttered.

>

> "I'm all for renewable energy but sometimes the

> options smack of jobs for the boys and lining

> pockets." poppy cock, @#$%& sight cheaper than

> ploughing it all into a new generation of nuclear

> power stations that will not only cost untold

> billions but will lump future generations with

> enormous clean up bills just as we're having to

> pay astronomical costs now for the first

> generation of stations.

>

> Wind farms are no magic solution but they're a

> bloody start.



They should be off-shore.

Sorry, pedant alert, I know the previous post was not altogether serious... watt is a measurement of power, not energy! For energy, you need joules, or kilowatt hours.


Population of 15-64 year olds: 40 million.

1 hour a day each

average 0.08 KW of power


Works out as 3.2 million KWh per year.


UK energy consumption is around 350 billion KWh per year.


Better start peddling!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I know the couple you mean, and she has always been friendly and smiley when delivering to me, but obviously in a hurry, for all the reasons outlined in the thread. My gate is always open, however (unless someone coming to the house closes it when they leave). I can't see the point of gates that have to be opened and shut again every time someone comes to the house. It just seems a waste of time, and it's annoying if you are carrying stuff. And a closed gate  conveys a sort of "my house is my fortress" feel. To me, anyway.
    • Thanks for posting this. Really interesting. It would be good if you added a star rating, so that it was easier to do comparisons / see what your top recommendations are. Great blog though!
    • Hi, Just a quick note to say it's six months since I launched Eats Dulwich. In that time I've reviewed 28 restaurants. Usually four or five a month except for a month when I came down with gout, which I guess is an occupational hazard. Don't say I don't suffer for my art. Early on someone – Sue, I think – asked me what I'm going to do when I've reviewed every restaurant in East Dulwich. I'm nowhere near that point, but what I have found is that a lot of new openings have tended to be in Rye Lane, so the site has expanded to cover SE15, hence the slight change of name (still haven't had any cease and desist letters from anything with a similar name).  Anyway, the site is still free, it would be great if as many readers as possible here can subscribe so that they automatically get new posts (when you try to subscribe the default might be paid subs but that's down to Substack, just tick the free option instead) as I don't post everything on EDF. Obviously you can get reviews elsewhere if you want, but I think this is the only proper site for local East Dulwich people written by a local East Dulwich person. If you like eating out please have a read. And if there are other places you think I should visit please mention them below and i'll do my best to try them. Link here: https://eatsdulwich.substack.com/  
    • Can you explain what your point was, then? Because it isn't clear to me. No. Perhaps you could provide a link and explain its relevance? That would be helpful     Those figures suggest that over 10,000,000 voters were not "rejecting a far left party."
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...