Jump to content

Recommended Posts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> explain what?

>

> did I need to put cheeky smiley face to show you I

> was joking

>

> because you insist in generalising about how

> someone looks, I turned a mirror on you with an

> unpleasant stereotype - equally untrue. Are you

> saying it bothers you?


It's the look and the image they project, that's what bothers me. It's a personal preference, and the total opposite of the originator of this thread. Your suggesting that this group are likeable almost cartoon like characters. I knew many "geezers" in my younger days, and they were for the most part nasty and certainly not worthy of admiration.

There is something in what you say about choosing a style as opposed to ethnicity, so in that sense it might be perceived as clumsy and if it dd bother you, I apologise


But a prejudice is still a prejudice surely? What happened in your younger days is no doubt a truth, but it's anecdotal and doesn't really square with the fact that many geezers are no better/worse than anyone else

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yer can keep yer geezers an' blokes an' fellahs

> -

> > we wus always chaps.

> >

> >

> http://thechapmagazine.co.uk/content/images/shop/b

>

> > ack/58.jpg

>

> Maxxi & Carnell are perfect bedfellow 'chaps'

> indeed

>

> And i'm pleased Lady D has acknowledged her

> Classic wearing Geezer-birdness, I wonder what the

> tat depicts ?


Oh dear - you've fallen into the obvious tabloid definition that is unable to determine chappiness by degrees, you have obviously never been in the The Queens (20 minutes to k.o.) when the call to prayer is heard "Awright chaps, let's go!"

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > maxxi Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Yer can keep yer geezers an' blokes an'

> fellahs

> > -

> > > we wus always chaps.

> > >

> > >

> >

> http://thechapmagazine.co.uk/content/images/shop/b

>

> >

> > > ack/58.jpg

> >

> > Maxxi & Carnell are perfect bedfellow 'chaps'

> > indeed

> >

> > And i'm pleased Lady D has acknowledged her

> > Classic wearing Geezer-birdness, I wonder what

> the

> > tat depicts ?

>

> Oh dear - you've fallen into the obvious tabloid

> definition that is unable to determine chappiness

> by degrees, you have obviously never been in the

> The Queens (20 minutes to k.o.) when the call to

> prayer is heard "Awright chaps, let's go!"


Oh I see, it was the magazine that threw me


Carnell is deffo the guy with the hat/pipe combo, by christ he even wears cardi's


Queens , where that maxxi ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...