Jump to content

Recommended Posts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> explain what?

>

> did I need to put cheeky smiley face to show you I

> was joking

>

> because you insist in generalising about how

> someone looks, I turned a mirror on you with an

> unpleasant stereotype - equally untrue. Are you

> saying it bothers you?


It's the look and the image they project, that's what bothers me. It's a personal preference, and the total opposite of the originator of this thread. Your suggesting that this group are likeable almost cartoon like characters. I knew many "geezers" in my younger days, and they were for the most part nasty and certainly not worthy of admiration.

There is something in what you say about choosing a style as opposed to ethnicity, so in that sense it might be perceived as clumsy and if it dd bother you, I apologise


But a prejudice is still a prejudice surely? What happened in your younger days is no doubt a truth, but it's anecdotal and doesn't really square with the fact that many geezers are no better/worse than anyone else

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yer can keep yer geezers an' blokes an' fellahs

> -

> > we wus always chaps.

> >

> >

> http://thechapmagazine.co.uk/content/images/shop/b

>

> > ack/58.jpg

>

> Maxxi & Carnell are perfect bedfellow 'chaps'

> indeed

>

> And i'm pleased Lady D has acknowledged her

> Classic wearing Geezer-birdness, I wonder what the

> tat depicts ?


Oh dear - you've fallen into the obvious tabloid definition that is unable to determine chappiness by degrees, you have obviously never been in the The Queens (20 minutes to k.o.) when the call to prayer is heard "Awright chaps, let's go!"

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > maxxi Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Yer can keep yer geezers an' blokes an'

> fellahs

> > -

> > > we wus always chaps.

> > >

> > >

> >

> http://thechapmagazine.co.uk/content/images/shop/b

>

> >

> > > ack/58.jpg

> >

> > Maxxi & Carnell are perfect bedfellow 'chaps'

> > indeed

> >

> > And i'm pleased Lady D has acknowledged her

> > Classic wearing Geezer-birdness, I wonder what

> the

> > tat depicts ?

>

> Oh dear - you've fallen into the obvious tabloid

> definition that is unable to determine chappiness

> by degrees, you have obviously never been in the

> The Queens (20 minutes to k.o.) when the call to

> prayer is heard "Awright chaps, let's go!"


Oh I see, it was the magazine that threw me


Carnell is deffo the guy with the hat/pipe combo, by christ he even wears cardi's


Queens , where that maxxi ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...