Jump to content

Bird walk at Camberwell Old Cemetery


Recommended Posts

Just wanted to post something about this to the local populous, well the ones who read the forum anyway...!


It was very well attended, (40+ people at a guess), many more than expected turned up.


We were treated to an 'after hours' tour of the cemetery, led by Daniel Greenwood from the London Wildlife Trust.

I must say it was very informative and enjoyable, learning about the flora, fauna and local history of the site which was detailed and fascinating.

The cemetery has pockets of wilderness which the the wildlife clearly make great use of.


In one hour, and considering we were a large group, we saw 2 species (among many others) that are listed as red on the RSPB danger list, which I would consider to be amazing considering the small footprint of the cemetery.


It was even more prescient considering the council's proposed plans to redevelop parts of the cemetery, something I'm personally against given the loss of habitat that would result.


For anyone that's interested, the latest council plan is to build a temporary toilet block in the middle of the cemetery... These plans have been rather subtle to say the least - 2 notices put up for the 'required period of time', but interestingly not mentioned directly by the council during a meeting about the general proposed redevelopment. I'm personally a bit bemused as to why such a relatively small cemetery requires a toilet block at all?


So as well as bigging up the bird walk, i'd also like to bring the council's plans (toilet block and 'redevelopment') to the attention of the forum to see what locals think.


All views welcome...

I am against Camberwell Old Cemetery's redevelopment and all for keeping it's natural habitat.


To me, Camberwell Old Cemetery seems to be turning into a Park, not a place of rest.

Whilst there I have observed dogs off their leads running all over the graves knocking and scattering grave ornaments over, parents and children playing football alongside graves and groups of cemetery "tourists" staring as you try to capture a quiet moment beside a loved ones grave.


As for a toilet block I don't think that's necessary either.


Maybe not many Dulwich residents have family members buried there but nonetheless please show some respect and keep your dogs on their leads and don't play balls games there... besides there are several parks in the area that you can do that.

I agree Laur,


Apart from the council plans to develop the wooded area of the cemetery, (for which they are giving 2 reasons for; increasing burial plots, or just to allow 'more pubic access',) the toilet block is a very strange move. I'm not aware of cemeteries having or needing toilets, let alone a cemetery as small as this. It doesn't really make any sense. Has it been requested by the public? As I said in my first post, there were 2 notices put up for a short time, nothing more.


Details can be found here;

http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?id=32956&LLL=0

While describing it as a 'temporary structure' it also alludes to it being replaced by a permanent structure in due course...


I'm personally concerned about the councils development plans for this cemetery, and the potential loss of the wooded area that is a haven for wildlife. Does anyone know any more about this?

If the cemetery is going to take more burials a toilet block is an excellent idea. You don't want to be caught short attending a funeral. They already have toilets at Camberwell New Cemetery. And even if it's not to cater for more burials, a toilet block is hardly going to decimate the local flora and fauna. Better than forcing people to perform behind graves.

Thanks for your input andcharall, but it appears you're missing the point slightly.

The whole point is the council plan to expand the cemetery, potentially causing the destruction the wild habitat that currently exists there. I don't believe this is wise.


As for the toilets, there is a pub very close to the cemetery so no real danger of anyone being 'caught short' while attending a funeral. As for 'better than forcing people to perform behind graves', not sure where that came from, or quite what it means. Nobodies forcing anyone to do any such thing. You're right to state that Camberwell New Cemetery has toilets, but to the best of my knowledge they've not been open for a while. (They're not currently listed as a facility on the Southwark website.) Plus it is a much larger space. I don't believe it's normal for a London cemetery to offer toilet facilities. I can find very few examples of those that do.


Either way, as I stated, the councils has plans for this cemetery. This toilet block is somewhat of a surprise and i'm struggling to understand the motivation behind it. Does a cemetery of such a compact size require it's own toilet block? I personally don't think so. I think it's a terrible idea.


And no, of course a toilet block is not going to 'decimate the local flora and fauna'. The expansion plans certainly will. Why are you talking in such extremes?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...