Jump to content

Bird walk at Camberwell Old Cemetery


Recommended Posts

Just wanted to post something about this to the local populous, well the ones who read the forum anyway...!


It was very well attended, (40+ people at a guess), many more than expected turned up.


We were treated to an 'after hours' tour of the cemetery, led by Daniel Greenwood from the London Wildlife Trust.

I must say it was very informative and enjoyable, learning about the flora, fauna and local history of the site which was detailed and fascinating.

The cemetery has pockets of wilderness which the the wildlife clearly make great use of.


In one hour, and considering we were a large group, we saw 2 species (among many others) that are listed as red on the RSPB danger list, which I would consider to be amazing considering the small footprint of the cemetery.


It was even more prescient considering the council's proposed plans to redevelop parts of the cemetery, something I'm personally against given the loss of habitat that would result.


For anyone that's interested, the latest council plan is to build a temporary toilet block in the middle of the cemetery... These plans have been rather subtle to say the least - 2 notices put up for the 'required period of time', but interestingly not mentioned directly by the council during a meeting about the general proposed redevelopment. I'm personally a bit bemused as to why such a relatively small cemetery requires a toilet block at all?


So as well as bigging up the bird walk, i'd also like to bring the council's plans (toilet block and 'redevelopment') to the attention of the forum to see what locals think.


All views welcome...

I am against Camberwell Old Cemetery's redevelopment and all for keeping it's natural habitat.


To me, Camberwell Old Cemetery seems to be turning into a Park, not a place of rest.

Whilst there I have observed dogs off their leads running all over the graves knocking and scattering grave ornaments over, parents and children playing football alongside graves and groups of cemetery "tourists" staring as you try to capture a quiet moment beside a loved ones grave.


As for a toilet block I don't think that's necessary either.


Maybe not many Dulwich residents have family members buried there but nonetheless please show some respect and keep your dogs on their leads and don't play balls games there... besides there are several parks in the area that you can do that.

I agree Laur,


Apart from the council plans to develop the wooded area of the cemetery, (for which they are giving 2 reasons for; increasing burial plots, or just to allow 'more pubic access',) the toilet block is a very strange move. I'm not aware of cemeteries having or needing toilets, let alone a cemetery as small as this. It doesn't really make any sense. Has it been requested by the public? As I said in my first post, there were 2 notices put up for a short time, nothing more.


Details can be found here;

http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?id=32956&LLL=0

While describing it as a 'temporary structure' it also alludes to it being replaced by a permanent structure in due course...


I'm personally concerned about the councils development plans for this cemetery, and the potential loss of the wooded area that is a haven for wildlife. Does anyone know any more about this?

If the cemetery is going to take more burials a toilet block is an excellent idea. You don't want to be caught short attending a funeral. They already have toilets at Camberwell New Cemetery. And even if it's not to cater for more burials, a toilet block is hardly going to decimate the local flora and fauna. Better than forcing people to perform behind graves.

Thanks for your input andcharall, but it appears you're missing the point slightly.

The whole point is the council plan to expand the cemetery, potentially causing the destruction the wild habitat that currently exists there. I don't believe this is wise.


As for the toilets, there is a pub very close to the cemetery so no real danger of anyone being 'caught short' while attending a funeral. As for 'better than forcing people to perform behind graves', not sure where that came from, or quite what it means. Nobodies forcing anyone to do any such thing. You're right to state that Camberwell New Cemetery has toilets, but to the best of my knowledge they've not been open for a while. (They're not currently listed as a facility on the Southwark website.) Plus it is a much larger space. I don't believe it's normal for a London cemetery to offer toilet facilities. I can find very few examples of those that do.


Either way, as I stated, the councils has plans for this cemetery. This toilet block is somewhat of a surprise and i'm struggling to understand the motivation behind it. Does a cemetery of such a compact size require it's own toilet block? I personally don't think so. I think it's a terrible idea.


And no, of course a toilet block is not going to 'decimate the local flora and fauna'. The expansion plans certainly will. Why are you talking in such extremes?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...