Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Those people who have recently been unhappy with the service provided by the Melbourne Grove Medical Practice will be interested to know that the Practice is conducting a survey of its patients' views.


Since the Practice's contract is coming up for renewal next year, if you want to send a shot against their bows, you might like to complete the survey. The risk is obviously that the Practice might throw any critical survey. Arguably it is not an impartial survey since an independent body should be conducting it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4592-melbourne-grove-practice-survey/
Share on other sites

All the GP practices in Southwark have just completed a patient survey (known as the GPAQ) which is a requirement of their contract with Southwark PCT, and the results go directly back to the PCT for analysis. GP practices then need to feedback the results of this survey to their patients - either on a noticeboard or newsletter. If they do not do this satisfactorily they will lose 'points' (money).

I don't think MG would be carrying out their own survey so soon after doing the mandatory GPAQ survey, so the survey you're referring to is administered independently.

Having been in the surgery yesterday I was given one of these surveys to fill in. On the front page it says that answers are treated in the strictest confidence (you don't write your name on anywhere) but then the 1st few questions are about what you think of the reception staff (IMO opinion very rude and unhelpful) and then you are expected to hand them back to the afroementioned reception staff once completed.... I wonder how many of those questionnaires actually make it back to the practice manager or whoever is conducting the survey...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Saw this today about Southwark voting in support of a tourist tax in the borough  BBC News - Tourist tax visitor levy comes closer in Southwark https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5ypvw0qln7o Makes me wonder what else they can find to tax, maybe a fine for breaking wind, or breathing or even a tax on windows. Of course I am being facetious but it does feel like if it moves, they will tax it. 
    • Politicians particularly so....remember it's always party before people! I doubt McAsh will be in cabinet much longer...he might find even more attempts to kneecap his political career. I wonder if he might have to move to another area and restart - he obviously has political ambition but it seems Southwark is not going to be where it blossoms anymore - unless he can manage some sort of coup.  
    • You could attend the next edf drinks    https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/360548-ed-forum-drinks/page/3/#comments
    • Hi Sue, they were not local solicitors. Andrea’s was based in Wales and the other firms involved were large nationwide conveyancing companies (rather than conventional high street solicitors). I’m happy to advise clients and buyers privately on what I believe to be their shortcomings but I don’t think doing so in public on the forum would be appropriate, particularly as they are not locally based. My general advice would always be to steer clear of the big conveyancing companies as they are, in my experience, notoriously difficult to contact when the need arises and the case handler is often not a fully qualified solicitor and so issues have to be referred upwards to “technical teams” internally, which was part of the problem in Andrea’s chain. Tony
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...