Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Those people who have recently been unhappy with the service provided by the Melbourne Grove Medical Practice will be interested to know that the Practice is conducting a survey of its patients' views.


Since the Practice's contract is coming up for renewal next year, if you want to send a shot against their bows, you might like to complete the survey. The risk is obviously that the Practice might throw any critical survey. Arguably it is not an impartial survey since an independent body should be conducting it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4592-melbourne-grove-practice-survey/
Share on other sites

All the GP practices in Southwark have just completed a patient survey (known as the GPAQ) which is a requirement of their contract with Southwark PCT, and the results go directly back to the PCT for analysis. GP practices then need to feedback the results of this survey to their patients - either on a noticeboard or newsletter. If they do not do this satisfactorily they will lose 'points' (money).

I don't think MG would be carrying out their own survey so soon after doing the mandatory GPAQ survey, so the survey you're referring to is administered independently.

Having been in the surgery yesterday I was given one of these surveys to fill in. On the front page it says that answers are treated in the strictest confidence (you don't write your name on anywhere) but then the 1st few questions are about what you think of the reception staff (IMO opinion very rude and unhelpful) and then you are expected to hand them back to the afroementioned reception staff once completed.... I wonder how many of those questionnaires actually make it back to the practice manager or whoever is conducting the survey...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...