Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We have two children, toddler who is currently at nursery 3 days a week (and we are very pleased with the care she receives there) and baby who is currently at home. I am going back to work full-time in a few months and the intention is to put both children to this nursery full time. My children will then be almost 3 and just over 1. The cost for both of them full time will be just over ?3k which I think is exceptionally high and as much as I adore this nursery I feel, I ought to consider other options. I am not too keen on childminder as I just don?t like the idea of my children being put in the buggy two times a day (rain or shine) and to go on a drop off/pick up for other children that this person will have in care. I also have a long list of other reasons why I don?t think a childminder is a right option for me. So at the moment I am considering two options:

1) Take full time nanny for both of them ? I will need 8-6:30, 5 days per week. I honestly think that nanny will never be able to provide as much quality time as they get at nursery simply because at home we have much less resources and this is my biggest dilemma with this option. I think this is particularly important for my older one as she will be just over 3 yrs old then and will need some age appropriate structured learning in order to get her prepared for school which nanny will not be able to do as she will have to run around after our younger one who will be all over the place by that point. Or am I just making the bigger deal of this than it is? I also have lots of questions regarding the cost of this option: What is the current rate for these hours or similar? How much on top of that is tax? How much in addition goes on car insurance, food for nanny, play groups, swimming and other activities?


2) Keep older one in nursery and get nanny share for younger one. Again same hours (8-6:30, 5 days per week). Nursery for older one will be just over ?1k due to government funding so the idea is that the nanny share reduces the cost for younger one. I would be more comfortable with this option as the 3yr old would get all the benefits from nursery and younger one will have a playmate who is similar age and enjoy home environment. Again, I am keen to know what is the current rate, additional tax and how does this work. Any issues specific for nanny share that I should consider i.e what do you do for holidays, do both families need to take them at the same time and when nanny gets her holidays?


Please let me know if you have similar dilemma, if you think I should consider childminder and why, if you have nanny/nanny share for children of similar age or if you know about the costs for either/both options. Many thanks

I have two children of similar ages. We have a nanny share with another family with a one year old. In September my three year old will be going to preschool for three days a week for free with her 15 hours, and for now is doing play dates when possible, plus playgroups. She is also a very maternal little person so enjoys spending time with the younger ones.


It is MUCH cheaper than two sets of nursery fees would be. And the convenience of a nanny is great. We're very happy. We use one of the nanny payroll companies to sort the tax stuff out.

I'm not sure if this will be particularly helpful but for your question abut whether you should consider a childminder, just to say that my childminder doesn't do nursery pick ups etc and I don't think that they all do necessarily?it involves a bit of shopping around which you may not have time or headspace for but for example my childminder has a maximum of 3 kids a day and she has them in her home, drives them to parks/stay and plays etc in the morning but then goes home for lunches and naps and the afternoons are based around play and learning in her home setting which is laid out around the children sort of like a nursery, with outside space etc. I think I might be quite lucky as childminders go, as I have heard tell of stories of childminders taking kids out to the supermarket on their own shopping run etc, and would similarly dislike the idea of my son being lugged around to fetch other kids or drop off (although a nanny share wouldn't sidestep this issue). But I don't think necessarily that all childminders have pick ups and drop offs as part of their service but you might have to just ask specifically about this as part of your criteria. My childminder isn't any cheaper than a nursery though so her lovely focused services come at quite a hefty price...

Can understand your dilemma (cost-wise) but do think you are making a bigger deal of some things.


You sound like you've already ruled out a childminder due to the possible buggy runs and a long list of other reasons. I'm a Registered Childminder and I've done school runs in the past and most nearly 3 year olds get a lot out of it. For instance, learning how to cross the road, spotting numbers on buses, letters on street names, going to a nursery/school environment. All basic stuff which helps prepare them for starting school in a few years time.


A full-time nanny is more than able to care for a 1 year old and 3 year old in the home I'm sure.

For my daughter, we've done a split between nanny 2 days a week, and nursery 3 days a week. This is a good mix of one-on-one time with the nanny, and excellent socialising at the nursery.


If your child(ren) attend a private nursery (all year long), then your free 15 hour grant will likely be spread over the weekly hours of the whole year, as the grant applies to term time attendance schedules.


Are you making a big deal of things? Who knows. Impossible to tell from a single post. But I think you should do whatever you will feel good about, not cause you extra stress. It's hard enough already just working and sorting childcare!

We have a full time nanny for our two (1.5 and 4.5), and my eldest goes to pre-school for his 15 hours which along with play dates etc seems to be more than enough socialising. Our pre-school is term-time only so I don't pay anything over and above his 15 free hours. I feel lucky to get the free hours, as it does seem like the perfect balance, and I'm not having to pay two sets of childcare costs - ie nanny salary plus nursery fees.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...