Tarot readins or psychic

[robyn88]

I was wondering if anyone could recommend a tarot reader or psychic that will do home visits? I hope I posted this in the right section!

[smith 41]

I had a feeling you were going to ask that

[Loz]

Surely they know you want to see them and they just turn up at you house?

[robyn88]

Haha! Thanks but it's a serious question!

[fernado]

It's all a load of baloney

[robyn88]

In your opinion...

[fernado]

I appreciate my post wasn't exactly helpful. Apologies. This lady might be able help: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1093876

[robyn88]

Thank you!

[david_carnell]

It's not really an opinion is it? It's just a fact. The truth.

Do you really believe some people have psychic powers or the ability to predict the future? Wouldn't they use their power for either a) making loads of money or b) saving the world rather than getting ?50 a pop for telling gullible types that they'll meet a tall dark stranger?

[Otta]

Maybe as well as having their powers they also smoke a lot of weed and lack the motivation for the big time.

[david_carnell]

I think consumption of a psychotropic drug might explain quite a lot Otta....

[MAK]

Don't get your future read. Nothing good ever comes out of it. It's all sorcery and illusionism.

[Alan Medic]

Can anyone prove that the future or the past actually exist? Surely the only thing that exists is the present.

[Alan Medic]

Thought not. They are either memories or speculation.

[Loz]

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thought not. They are either memories or speculation.

When did you post this message, AM?

[maxxi]

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Thought not. They are either memories or

> speculation.

>

> When did you post this message, AM?

And if there was no one there to see it at the exact time that it was posted - did it make sense?

[Loz]

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > Alan Medic Wrote:

> > --------------------------------------------------

> > > Thought not. They are either memories or speculation.

> >

> > When did you post this message, AM?

>

> And if there was no one there to see it at the exact time that it was posted - did it make sense?

Not that it matters - you are all figments of my imagination anyway.

[Alan Medic]

In the past. At the time it was the present.

[El Pibe]

So is the star in the sky there in the past or in the present?

[Alan Medic]

That's light you are seeing not a star.

[El Pibe]

light is all you ever see, does that prove that past existed or to paraphrase you, "Surely the only thing that exists is the past." It's your present that's an illusion ;)

[Alan Medic]

Existed yes. Exists, no. That's paraphrasing me?? You're probably right as a lot of the 'present' is an illusion.

[El Pibe]

9 posts up.

aah, so when you say that the past exists you mean in the present.

Isn't that rather begging the question?

If time is non linear its entirely non sequitur.

In fact if time is non linear then you can't....ermmm...sequit?

[Alan Medic]

No. I don't mean the past exists in the present. Only that the present is all that exists now. What happened in the 'past' may indeed affect the present because most of us find it difficult not to try and live there or in the future. Thereby missing the only moment they have that's actually real, the present.

We are in the top half of the hourglass. What's in the bottom half is what was and is no more.

[El Pibe]

But isn't the star proof that the past existed in the past, or are you suggesting that light magically materialises in your eye?

We good test for it but tests imply cause and effect which, though rather begging the question again, probably imply that time is linear therefore the past existed.