Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Fischia-I should have been clearer.


I wasn't comparing Hatcham's intake to Charter but rather to its local secondary schools in Lewisham (which is what would make most sense in assessing if its admission policy was skewing intake vs its local area).


I'm not sure that's true but I think someone else on the Habs thread after looking at their bands came to that conclusion.

Pendergrast is the only other school in Lewisham that do a different banding system so both schools come in with very low proportion of low-attainers. That's worrying.


Habs Knight seems to be around average (nationally and with Lewisham) despite having the same admission policy as Hatcham though which is strange. It seems to suggest that its parents failing to apply rather than the application process per se that's causing the intake to skew.


This phenomena of self-exclusion from academically sucessful schools by low-attaining families is something the Sutton Trust highlighted as an unexpected issue with fair banding achieving a comprehensive intake.

I agree-- that's also why I think they are pushing so hard to open a 2nd primary school in ED. I personally think they want to have some schools in affluent areas that statistically are likely to do well with less effort.


Renata has suggested to Harris on this forum that they open a primary school in the (poorer) northern part of the borough where there is actually a real need / still an existing shortfall. Somehow they find that less pressing / compelling case than opening up a school for Nunhead in East Dulwich which already as a 2.5 form surplus by 2016...


ETA: With that said, I do think they are a good school provider and do well for low attainers in their schools. ED Harris Girls has 22% low attainers and those low attainers do better there than they do at our other local secondaries. Middle and high attainers do as well as at ED Harris as at our other local secondaries like the Charter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...