Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all


just wondering if anyone can answer my query? I have been with the same mortgage provider for about five years now and I want to take some extra money out for home improvements (I have a lot of equity so a low LTV, which is great, know I'm lucky!) The only problem is that when I initially took out the mortgage my income was higher than it is now and allowed me to get the level of mortgage I needed. However now my income is lower so that if I applied for a new mortgage now I probably wouldn't get it (I've just moved products over the years and they've never asked me any questions about my income)

Anyway, my question is that, in order to borrow the extra on my mortgage (about ?10k) I'm assuming that they will have to do all the income checks on me - now I know this might mean they refuse to give me a further advance but could it also mean, now that my circumstances have changed, that they can take my mortgage off me? Or once you're in a product and paying it with no problems (I've had a mortgage for 16 years and have never even made a late payment)they wouldn't do that? Not knowing the answer to this (if indeed there is a uniform answer) means I'm too scared to call them about a possible advance.

Any advice greatly appreciated.

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/48705-mortgage-question/
Share on other sites

Why don't you speak to a mortgage broker and get their view on it. Given the new Mortgage Market Review rules that are making it harder for people to get mortgages and remortgage they might be able to give you a view as to whether you are likely to get a mortgage at the amount you want.

emc - I called recently about borrowing extra dosh for some building work/improvements, the lender said it would be either a new mortgage or extension to current mortgage amount, but the full checks etc. would be necessary either way.

The lenders are under stricter rules these days.

If you're stuck though and need a mortgage advisor, PM me as I have a guy I've used for years and he's solid.

Good luck.

Thanks all for the answers so far - I guess my biggest fear is not that they won't give me the extra ?10k - it's that they might take my existing mortgage off me when they know about my reduced income. Even though am paying regularly with no problems at all and have a low loan to value. Guess i should just ask a mortgage adviser. Cheers all

I would say the bottom line is how much in total they are prepared to loan you on the basis of your income. If it exceeds your current borrowings then the difference is how much. As for taking your current mortgage off you I don't know how they could do that given your payment history.


Why don't you try their website as a potential new borrower and see what results you come up with?

On what grounds would they be able to "take the mortgage off" you if you are making the repayments? If you were defaulting, then they would have a case, but otherwise, I am not sure they would be able to. (i don't know, just can't see it) That would mean them forcing you to sell the house for no good reason


To see how you would stand to borrow the extra, put your total borrowing requirements and your current incomings/outgoings into their website and see if they would lend to you. If not, then there is probably little point in approaching them anyway. Good luck!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...