Jump to content

RE: threat to Metropolitan Open Land in Southwark Plan


Borderlands

Recommended Posts

Just taken a quick look through the papers about the proposed new Southwark Plan having read a short piece in this week's South London Press. This mention the possibility of building on MOL that's included in it and the consultation papers. In one paper there is a proposal to alter DM57 which presumably protects MOL to allow school expansion. Even supposing that precious MOL (which has this designation because of regional and local importance) can be shaved off in this way because, say, local parents are keen for expansion, the larger document isn't so clear cut. There is no reference to such a restriction and importantly no listing of any of the particular MOL designations so this can be checked.


This is just like in the 1980s with some Southwark councillors and most officers scared of opposing building in the face of a Tory-developer led government. Then too they were scared of financial punishment. There was a ton of greenwash in the Southwark plan of that time, when community and civic societies (from the riverside to Sydenham) combined with the London Wildlife Trust and the GLC to protect Sydenham Hill Woods and other green spaces in the borough. This took years of campaigning.


Does anyone have any further information about what is proposed? An MOL designation is extremely important in terms of planning - it's our long thin borough's townscape/landscape at stake here. The designation protects our historic woods (captive countryside), the cemeteries, the parks, and the greens and playing fields. Once a way is found to circumvent this protection it will become a precedent even if no-one wants it to : a little bit taken away here or there eventually means it becomes less and less viable especially as habitat.


BTW, whatever happened to imaginative refurbishment, tracking the number of empty properties and so on rather that demolition and building on green space? This kind of LB Southwark supported development in the north of the borough particularly (around London Bridge) goes to show how little they are really interested or passionate about our borough's specific character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's getting ridiculous in the UK now. Having been to Leeds recently where there are massive abandoned solid buildings dotted around just left there to rot,(and I daresay other major cities have the same scenarios),and in London we are threatened with having precious green space concreted over.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, he's pretty adamant a party wall agreement isn't needed so no chance of getting plans, he's been very cagey about what's being done. I've asked for the specific clause in the Party Wall Act that suggests he doesn't because I'm pretty worried. Is it just the chimney breasts that would fall under the act? He's insisting the others don't count as party walls.
    • Thanks  for the reminder nellie. Have today received two letters dated February 2024. Heading down to Highshore Road tomorrow to see if there's anything for us. I'm getting obsessive about missing/late arriving bills since having our phone and broadband cut off when we hadn't received (so hadn't paid) a bill from BT that had been posted to us. I now keep a note in my diary of when the various utility bills are expected, and phoning them when I think something is due, invariably they say the bill has been sent out. It shouldn't be so hard.
    • He’ll need to apply to building control if he’s removing a chimney breast, as that has to be signed off once the work is done. Make sure the joists for your floor are extended to full width of the room once the chimney breast is removed. Ours weren’t (by the previous owner when they removed the chimney breast in the kitchen) and the floor above was dipping by a few inches. 
    • Chimney breast removal definitely requires party wall agreement and if yours above is not being removed it will require steels to support the chimney breast above.  You should consult your own party wall surveyor and serve notices on your neighbour and they will be liable for the cost of your surveyor.  Also worth contacting the southwark building regs inspector for advice as removing a load bearing wall also requires steels to support the walls above and will require building regs. Has your neighbour shown you the plans to show how they are going to support your walls above?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...