Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just taken a quick look through the papers about the proposed new Southwark Plan having read a short piece in this week's South London Press. This mention the possibility of building on MOL that's included in it and the consultation papers. In one paper there is a proposal to alter DM57 which presumably protects MOL to allow school expansion. Even supposing that precious MOL (which has this designation because of regional and local importance) can be shaved off in this way because, say, local parents are keen for expansion, the larger document isn't so clear cut. There is no reference to such a restriction and importantly no listing of any of the particular MOL designations so this can be checked.


This is just like in the 1980s with some Southwark councillors and most officers scared of opposing building in the face of a Tory-developer led government. Then too they were scared of financial punishment. There was a ton of greenwash in the Southwark plan of that time, when community and civic societies (from the riverside to Sydenham) combined with the London Wildlife Trust and the GLC to protect Sydenham Hill Woods and other green spaces in the borough. This took years of campaigning.


Does anyone have any further information about what is proposed? An MOL designation is extremely important in terms of planning - it's our long thin borough's townscape/landscape at stake here. The designation protects our historic woods (captive countryside), the cemeteries, the parks, and the greens and playing fields. Once a way is found to circumvent this protection it will become a precedent even if no-one wants it to : a little bit taken away here or there eventually means it becomes less and less viable especially as habitat.


BTW, whatever happened to imaginative refurbishment, tracking the number of empty properties and so on rather that demolition and building on green space? This kind of LB Southwark supported development in the north of the borough particularly (around London Bridge) goes to show how little they are really interested or passionate about our borough's specific character.

It's getting ridiculous in the UK now. Having been to Leeds recently where there are massive abandoned solid buildings dotted around just left there to rot,(and I daresay other major cities have the same scenarios),and in London we are threatened with having precious green space concreted over.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...