Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yeah I get fed up of hearing leftie thrown at anyone who argues for a fairer distribution of income. Capitalism doesn't have to be this way. It CAN be fairer.


I think the article is pretty spot on in some of the observations it makes (especially regarding property and housing). There has been a lot of heads buried in sand over the last 40 years. But blaming the baby boomer generation doesn't sit right with me. Most of them only did what they were told. They went to work, paid into pensions and retired. They were promised something for that. Successive government policy has played a far bigger role in putting us in the mess we are in, by not finding alternatives for declining sources of mass employment, by not preventing the devaluation of labour (wages). It's too easy to look at one generation, with on one hand, the politics of envy (yes the system worked perfectly for them), and on the other, to blame them for living longer.


Are they responsible for the ?28 billion we are spending each year to subsidise the wages of millions of people in full time work because their enployers don't pay enough for them to live on? Understandable if we are talking about a small business that is genuinely struggling, but more often than not we are talking about the min wage jobs offered by the big multi-nationals. Wealth has shifted away from labour (wages) and into capital assets and investments. If we are ever going to rebalance the economy that has to change. National wealth needs to come back into people's pockets. And a capitalist system can deliver that just as easily as what we have now.

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here's another perspective: Lewisham Council has

> appropriated my inheritance to pay for care home

> fees while I'm paying bundles towards a flat for

> my nipper.


Never quite understand the "appropriated my inheritance" argument. Two points:


1. Most of our parents generation started with nothing (very much) except the chance to be killed in WWII - so why should we benefit from them.


2. If you're really worried about inheritance - don't sell the property and use the capital to fund care home fees. Let it and use the rent to pay care home fees. That way you / your parent still has the asset.

You're right, except one of the arguments levelled against the boomers is that they somehow ran off with the housing lolly when many are funding their children and their parents.


And no way was the rent on her house going to cover three grand a month care home charges

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're right, except one of the arguments levelled

> against the boomers is that they somehow ran off

> with the housing lolly when many are funding their

> children and their parents.

>

> And no way was the rent on her house going to

> cover three grand a month care home charges


Oh well - it worked well enough for our family. Pension + rent + family support = just enough to cover care home fees in specialist dementia home. In the end it one of netted out - family contribution over time was rewarded by share of inheritance - a bit more than we paid in fees at least. Seemed fair all round.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit of a long shot but I'm on the lookout for a portable pop-up counter or podium.   The kind you often see on a high street, used by charities or utility companies to advertise their wares.   I've included a photo to give you the idea. I'm a peckham-based artist and am looking for one for a free (and non-profit) community art project.  It can be in any workable condition and can already have signage on it as we will remove and redecorate ourselves.    Thanks in advance, Linzie
    • No I absolutely did not - that much is clear. Have you read the latest stories about Unite, Len and the hotel in Birmingham? The UK electorate were smart enough to reject a far-left party in 2019, let's hope they are smart enough to reject a far-right party at the next election too. If not we are all doomed.
    • I would also like to add my recommendation for James.  I had taken four names of electricians from the forum - in the order I had read the reviews.  First three no response - even days later. I phoned James this morning. He answered, gave me a time, stuck to it, messaged again 15 mins before arrival.  He fixed my problem on the spot.  Sensible charge out fee. Perfect service.  
    • Most recent polls for the next election suggest it will be a hung parliament, with Reform the largest party by a fair margin. But that is predicated on Reform finding around 300 candidates who are actually electable. Given the number of Reform council candidates who have had to drop out prior to or after the local elections, does that seem likely? Social media is pretty unforgiving when it comes to finding skeletons in cupboards; a retweet or a like seems enough to scupper political ambitions. A few may defect from other parties, but do you think the electorate would really vote for so many brand new MPs from a newish party?  I'm not so sure.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...