Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hiya, I don't have any direct experience, but the Institute of Mathematics has various resources (http://www.ima.org.uk/careers/maths_careers.cfm.html) and there is a link for a maths careers website (http://www.mathscareers.org.uk/). From my experience of working with other institutes, they tend to be very willing to point you in the right direction as well if approached directly.

Best of luck!

m

The National Autistic Society gave a talk at my workplace about the work they do to support people with autism in securing a job. They also supported people in work and their employers on an ongoing basis. Typical jobs included working in banks / the city / government doing work involving understanding of complex systems or data management. The Society rep said he had developed good links with employers who valued highly the reliability, commitment and knowledge of complex systems of people with autism. Maybe it would be worth contacting the Society for advice?

I'm happy to speak to him and help him clarify next steps. I mainly support mid-level/senior-level professionals but I have extensive recruitment (graduate, consultancy & in-house) experience so can provide some complimentary guidance/direction/recommendations.


Here's more information on my practice: http://www.objcoaching.com/private/career/


Best wishes,

Obi

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...