Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://www.education.gov.uk/cgi-bin/schools/performance/group.pl?qtype=LA&superview=pri&view=aat&set=1&tab=1&no=210&sort=ks2_14.ptreadwrittamatx14&ord=desc


ED-ish schools by Percentage achieving Level 4 or above in reading, writing and maths

- Fairlawn: 98%

- Dulwich Hamlets: 95%

- Horniman: 88%

- Bessemer Grange: 88%

- St Anthony: 86%

- Goodrich: 83%

-> Southwark average: 81%

- Heber: 79%

- St John & St Clement: 72%

- St Francesca Cabrini: 73%

- Goose Green: 73%

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/52403-ks2-2014-results-out/
Share on other sites

Thanks! Just wanted to add that it is worth looking at the percentages of pupils making expected progress as well as the overall levels. The % achieving L4+ doesn't take into account the levels children started at - you can get a better idea of the impact the school has had by looking at the percentages making expected progress or the value added score. (A VA score of 100 means pupils are performing as expected based on KS1 scores while above 100 implies the school is adding value). there is more info here:


http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/performance/primary_14/index.html


and the following extract explains it quite well "To get a rounded view of school/college performance, it is important to look at more than one performance measure when comparing schools. For example, while attainment figures tell you about the performance at the end of a key stage for a certain group of pupils, it doesn?t tell you how far they have progressed from their starting point.


Expected progress and value added measures give you further context about how effective a school is for pupils, taking their level of attainment at the previous key stage into account. For example, you may find that a school?s pupils achieve low results if you consider only their overall attainment at the end of the key stage. However, if you look at their pupil progress or value added results, their pupils may actually be achieving higher results than would be expected given their starting points. "


Heber's VA score is higher than DHJS for example although one is above and one below the LA average.

Thanks for the explanation. However, I am confused as reading Heber's Ofsted report, it appears one of the main reasons for Heber being downgraded to "needs improving" was that that the children weren't making enough progress given their initial starting point?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It looks as though there will be 10 of us!  We are going to Love Dulwich again for a lunch and will checkout their 'normal' menu - from what we remember from the last 2 times we went = there was plenty to satisfy every one and they were happy to take party bookings.- Hubby and I have worked out that if all our daughters, grandchildren and great grandchildren were  to come - there would be 20 of us!! As it is - the Essex  family branch live too far away to come over for an evening - so we will meet up in Essex at a later date.
    • Tend to use 37 or 42 bus as rarely been able to find parking space. Sods Law - there is sometimes a few spaces when I bus it.!
    • Just to warn anyone thinking of employing or engaging Chris and Anna Richmond, that nothing has changed.  The accounts above from others are all too familiar.  A job that we were told would take between 6-8 months is now entering its 23rd month.  They have taken enormous amounts of money from us, finished nothing, and the quality of the work that they have delivered is poor to substandard.  They take no responsibility themselves - there are endless excuses and everything is someone else's fault.  They do not care about the impact that their actions have on anyone else.   They are, at best, chaotic. They have not delivered as the designers or project managers that they claim to be. They are rarely on site to monitor the progress or quality of the job that is being delivered and they and manage their largely non-English speaking workforce by WhatsApp and Google translate.  There has been little evidence that they employ the skilled tradespeople needed to lay tiles, install bathrooms and kitchens, decorate and complete to the standard that we have paid for.  I cannot stress enough, that if you are currently in discussion with Anna and Chris Richmond about a future job or have paid them money up front for a job that they have slipped in delivering, to quit while you are ahead.  Things won't get better.
    • Hi All, I’d like to recommend Aaron Manser, who several others on this forum have also used. Aaron is an excellent plasterer, and has just finished a complicated piece of plastering work for me, including a large expanse of ceiling. His work has been of the highest quality, his attention to detail is exceptional, and he’s also very quick, and tidy too. As an added bonus he has a lovely singing voice. Happy to provide any photos of the work he has done. This is the third time over the past few years I’ve had Aaron back. Aaron Manser - 07773 410661 Regards, Damien
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...