Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Missmack1981, I've adjusted my earlier post; hope

> that's now ok, though just realised it probably

> means you'll now want to adjust yours too! Sorry.


Not a problem. :)

Unforgivable husband returning home without a Chattering Classes verified cheese on toast...!


But otherwise, top form! Ever since the forum started, I think this is the only ever crime related thread where the criminals have actually been caught.


Saw our lovely local bobby and a WPC visiting the local shops and were in the Co-Op late this afternoon, possibly related?


We need a local Police Station again.

We had one before http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1351584/Detective-gang-sold-drugs-seized-in-raids.html


se22cat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unforgivable husband returning home without a

> Chattering Classes verified cheese on toast...!

>

> But otherwise, top form! Ever since the forum

> started, I think this is the only ever crime

> related thread where the criminals have actually

> been caught.

>

> Saw our lovely local bobby and a WPC visiting the

> local shops and were in the Co-Op late this

> afternoon, possibly related?

>

> We need a local Police Station again.

Wow, well done to your mother in law and husband! What utter scumbags.


My granny (not in London) scared off a would be attacker in a public toilets once. She was really happy until she was described as an 'elderly lady' in the local newspaper!


se22cat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But otherwise, top form! Ever since the forum

> started, I think this is the only ever crime

> related thread where the criminals have actually

> been caught.

I started one about 4 or 5 years ago when the police arrested someone trying to break into my flat - I called 999 and they caught him. Admittedly turned out he was so drunk that he was having trouble trying to climb out of the front garden, but still they did catch him. Was quite sad actually as I went to court and it turned out he was homeless and couldn't remember why he was trying to get in.

LAST POST I promise.


Culprit with stolen cards on him was also illegally in this country so is being investigated by customs with a view to be deported.

Other two released as no evidence on them etc.


Hopefully they've fled and won't be back but still continue to be vigilant. They were targeting lone women at cash points on a day/ time the banks were closed. It was outside HSBC and they were coosing their targets from Dulwich cafe opposite.

An illegal immigrant would be investigated by immigration, not customs. What does the banks being closed have to do with anything? I saw someone get robbed at a cash point outside HSBC around 11 am one weekday morning. The guy used a screwdriver to stab her in the ribs.

Oh mustard that's obviously what I mean!


Referring to a previous post, if someone is distracted by this technique, they may believe card has been swallowed. If the bank is shut, it buys the criminal time to use the card before it is reported.

Baggs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When banks are open there is the option to go

> inside and use the ATMs that are in the building.


HSBC doesn't have an ATM inside, does Barclays? It didn't when I banked there.


If my card was swallowed, or stolen, I just phone my bank, they are open 24/7.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...